Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27344658›Full record

ReviewCommunity mental health journal2017

Peer Models in Mental Health for Caregivers and Families.

Mary Acri, Cole D Hooley, Nicole Richardson, Lily B Moaba

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Community mental health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Engaging Youth Voice and Family Partnerships to Improve Children's Mental Health Outcomes.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  7. Eating Disorders: Updates and Innovations.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The parents aren't alright, either: Commentary on Wilksch (2023).The International journal of eating disorders · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluating the effectiveness of the Family Connections program for caregivers of youth with mental health challenges, part II: A qualitative analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary AcriThe McSilver Institute for Poverty, Policy and Research, New York University School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, Room #8-305, New York, NY, 10016, USA. mary.acri@nyumc.org.
Cole D HooleyThe McSilver Institute for Poverty, Policy and Research, New York University School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, Room #8-305, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Nicole RichardsonThe McSilver Institute for Poverty, Policy and Research, New York University School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, Room #8-305, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Lily B MoabaThe McSilver Institute for Poverty, Policy and Research, New York University School of Medicine, One Park Avenue, Room #8-305, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

Research Methods CoreP30MH090322 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E. · 2011 to 2015
$8.1M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH090322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer-delivered mental health models may hold important benefits for family members, yet their prevalence, components, and outcomes are unknown. We conducted a review of peer-delivered services for families of children and adults with mental health problems. Randomized studies of interventions published between 1990 and 2014 were included if the intervention contained a component for family members and examined familial outcomes. Of 77 studies that were assessed for their eligibility, six met criteria. Familial components included coping and parenting skills, knowledge about mental health, and emotional support. Outcomes were uneven, although significant improvements in family functioning, knowledge about mental illness, parental concerns about their child, and parenting skills were associated with the intervention. Peer-delivered services for family members may have important benefits to family members and individuals with mental health problems; however, the research base remains thin. A research agenda to develop and examine these models is discussed.

Indexed as

Mental HealthModels, TheoreticalPeer GroupAdaptation, PsychologicalCaregiversFamilyFamily TherapyHumansMental DisordersAdult mental healthChildren’s mental healthFamily-based servicesPeer family support

Identifiers

PMID27344658
PMCPMC5555254
OpenAlexW2461572114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.