Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27344508›Full record

ArticleTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2016

Clinical and methodological factors affecting non-transferrin-bound iron values using a novel fluorescent bead assay.

Maciej W Garbowski, Yongmin Ma, Suthat Fucharoen, Somdet Srichairatanakool, Robert Hider, John B Porter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. The (Bio)Chemistry of Non-Transferrin-Bound Iron.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maciej W GarbowskiResearch Haematology Department, Cancer Institute, University College London, UK; University College London Hospitals, Haematology Department, London, UK. Electronic address: maciej.garbowski@ucl.ac.uk.
Yongmin MaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Suthat FucharoenThalassemia Research Centre, Institute of Science and Technology for Research and Development, Mahidol University Hospital, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Somdet SrichairatanakoolDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang-Mai University Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Robert HiderInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
John B PorterResearch Haematology Department, Cancer Institute, University College London, UK; University College London Hospitals, Haematology Department, London, UK.
University College Hospital · GBChiang Mai University · THKing's College London · GBMahidol University · THZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nontransferrin-bound iron (NTBI) is a heterogeneously speciated plasma iron, typically detectable when transferrin saturation (TfSat) exceeds 75%. Here, we examine factors affecting NTBI levels by a recently discovered direct chelator-based (CP851) fluorescent bead-linked flow-cytometric assay (bead-NTBI), compared with the established indirect nitrilotriacetate (NTA) assay in 122 iron-overloaded patients, including 64 on recent iron chelation therapy and 13 healthy volunteers. Both methods correlated (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001) but with low agreement, attributable to 2 major factors: (1) the NTA method, unlike the bead method, is highly dependent on TfSat, with NTBI under-estimation at low TfSat and over-estimation once Tf is saturated, (2) the bead method detects <3-fold higher values than the NTA assay in patients on recent deferiprone-containing chelation due to greater detection of chelate complexes but lower values for patients on deferasirox. The optimal timing of sample collection relative to chelation dosing requires further study. Patients with splenectomy, high-storage iron, and increased erythropoiesis had greater discrepancy between assays, consistent with differential access by both methods to the NTBI pools associated with these clinical variables. The bead-NTBI assay has advantages over the NTA assay, being less dependent on TfSat, hence of less tendency for false-negative or false-positive values at low and high TfSat, respectively.

Indexed as

MicrospheresBiological AssayFluorescenceHumansIronIron Chelating AgentsNitrilotriacetic AcidRegression AnalysisTransferrinIronIron Chelating AgentsNitrilotriacetic AcidTransferrin

Identifiers

PMID27344508
PMCPMC5110642
OpenAlexW2419101479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.