Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27344327›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Meta-analysis of cardiovascular toxicity risks in cancer patients on selected targeted agents.

C P Escalante, Y C Chang, K Liao, T Rouleau, J Halm, P Bossi, S Bhadriraju, N Brito-Dellan, S Sahai, S W Yusuf and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C P EscalanteDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. cescalan@mdanderson.org.
Y C ChangHouston Independent School District, Houston, TX, USA.
K LiaoDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
T RouleauCarolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
J HalmDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
P BossiFondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
S BhadrirajuDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
N Brito-DellanDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
S SahaiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
S W YusufDepartment of Cardiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
A ZalpourDivision of Pharmacy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
L S EltingDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Epidemiology Section of the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCarolinas Medical Center · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITHouston Independent School District · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose was to estimate the risk and severity of cardiovascular toxicities associated with selected targeted agents.

methodsWe searched English-language literature for randomized clinical trials published between January 1, 2000 and November 30, 2013 of targeted cancer therapy drugs approved by the FDA by November 2010. One hundred ten studies were eligible. Using meta-analytic methods, we calculated the relative risks of several cardiovascular toxicities [congestive heart failure (CHF), decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (DLVEF), myocardial infarction (MI), arrhythmia, and hypertension (HTN)], adjusting for sample size using the inverse-variance technique. For each targeted agent and side effect, we calculated the number needed to harm.

resultsRegarding CHF, trastuzumab showed significantly greater risk of all-grade and high-grade CHF. There was significant increased risk of all-grade DLVEF with sorafenib, sunitinib, and trastuzumab and high-grade DLVEF with bevacizumab and trastuzumab. Sorafenib was associated with significant increased all-grade risk of MI based on one study. None was associated with high-grade risk of MI or increased risk of arrhythmia. Bevacizumab, sorafenib, and sunitinib had significant increased risk of all-grade and high-grade HTN.

conclusionsSeveral of the targeted agents were significantly associated with increased risk of specific cardiovascular toxicities, CHF, DLVEF, and HTN. Several had significant increased risk for high-grade cardiovascular toxicities (CHF, DLVEF, and HTN). Patients receiving such therapy should be closely monitored for these toxicities and early and aggressive treatment should occur. However, clinical experience has demonstrated that some of these toxicities may be reversible and due to secondary effects.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCardiovascular toxicityCongestive heart failureDecreased left ventricular ejection fractionHypertensionMyocardial infarctionTargeted agent

Identifiers

PMID27344327
OpenAlexW2462504292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.