Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27344310›Full record

ReviewDiabetologia2016

Proteomics for prediction of disease progression and response to therapy in diabetic kidney disease.

Michelle J Pena, Harald Mischak, Hiddo J L Heerspink

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Antidiabetic effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Stratification of diabetic kidney diseasesFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  16. Current updates on protein as biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle J PenaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Harald MischakBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands. h.j.lambers.heerspink@umcg.nl.
Mosaiques Diagnostics and Therapeutics (Germany) · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has resulted in multiple new findings of potential proteomic biomarkers of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Many of these biomarkers reflect an important role in the (patho)physiology and biological processes of DKD. Situations in which proteomics could be applied in clinical practice include the identification of individuals at risk of progressive kidney disease and those who would respond well to treatment, in order to tailor therapy for those at highest risk. However, while many proteomic biomarkers have been discovered, and even found to be predictive, most lack rigorous external validation in sufficiently powered studies with renal endpoints. Moreover, studies assessing short-term changes in the proteome for therapy-monitoring purposes are lacking. Collaborations between academia and industry and enhanced interactions with regulatory agencies are needed to design new, sufficiently powered studies to implement proteomics in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersDiabetes MellitusDiabetic NephropathiesDisease ProgressionHumansKidney DiseasesProteomeProteomicsBiomarkersProteomeDiabetes mellitusKidney diseaseProteomicsReview

Identifiers

PMID27344310
PMCPMC4969331
OpenAlexW2467108967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.