Towards a synergy framework across neuroscience and robotics: Lessons learned and open questions. Reply to comments on: "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Finger stability in precision grips.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
   Article
2. Temporal control of muscle synergies is linked with alpha-band neural drive.The Journal of physiology · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands.2016
• Comment on
  Are we ready to move beyond the reductionist approach of classical synergy control?: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by Marco Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  A physicist's view on biological synergies: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by Marco Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  Integration of robotics and neuroscience beyond the hand: What kind of synergies?: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by Marco Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  Grasping versus knitting: A geometric perspective: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by M. Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  Learning in robotic manipulation: The role of dimensionality reduction in policy search methods: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by Marco Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  Beyond synergies: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by Marco Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  Neuro-prosthetic interplay: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by M. Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  Transferring synergies from neuroscience to robotics: Comment on "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by M. Santello et al.2016
• Comment on
  Working hard to make a simple definition of synergies: Comment on: "Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands" by Marco Santello et al.2016

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as