Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27344029›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2016

Suicide risk characteristics among aborted, interrupted, and actual suicide attempters.

Taylor A Burke, Jessica L Hamilton, Brooke A Ammerman, Jonathan P Stange, Lauren B Alloy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07120477 (Esketamine Versus Crisis Response Planning Versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual for Suicide Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07120477 phase4suspendednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Esketamine Versus Crisis Response Planning Versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual for Suicide Prevention: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial in a Brazilian Municipality (SAVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2026 to 2029Enrolled468ConditionsSuicide Prevention, Ketamine, Crisis Response PlanArmsIntravenous Esketamine, Crisis Response Planning intervention (structures safety planning)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Functions of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Late Adolescence: A Latent Class Analysis.Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding Suicide Risk within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework: Insights, Challenges, and Future Research Considerations.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taylor A BurkePsychology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: taylor.burke@temple.edu.
Jessica L HamiltonPsychology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brooke A AmmermanPsychology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jonathan P StangePsychology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lauren B AlloyPsychology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Temple University · US

Funding

Risk for Bipolar Disorder: Reward-related Brain Function & Social RhythmsR01MH077908 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ALLOY, LAUREN BERSH · 2007 to 2017
$5.7M
Acute Effects of Interpersonal Stress on Behavioral Indices of NSSIF31MH107156 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI AMMERMAN, BROOKE A · 2015 to 2016
$69k
Physiological Markers of Stress Generation and Affect Reactivity in DepressionF31MH106184 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI HAMILTON, JESSICA LEIGH · 2014 to 2015
$64k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH106184NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH107156NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have investigated suicide risk characteristics associated with interrupted and aborted suicide attempts. The present study aimed to empirically examine whether assessing a history of interrupted and aborted suicide attempts is valuable when assessing suicide risk, given the relative lack of literature in this area to date. To inform this question, the current study examined differences in risk factors for suicidal behavior among individuals who have carried out a suicide attempt, individuals who report having a history of only interrupted and/or aborted suicide attempts, and non-attempter controls. Approximately 447 undergraduates (M=21.10 years; SD=4.16; 77.6% female) completed measures of carried out suicide attempts, interrupted suicide attempts, aborted suicide attempts, acquired capability for suicide, suicide likelihood, depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and non-suicidal self-injury. Results suggest that a faction of individuals endorse interrupted and/or aborted suicide attempts (8.7%), but do not endorse carried out suicide attempts, even in non-clinical samples. Furthermore, results suggest that there are few clinically meaningful differences between those with a history of carried out suicide attempts and interrupted/aborted suicide attempts, suggesting that individuals with a history of these lesser studied suicidal behaviors are an important group to target for suicide risk intervention.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionAdolescentAdultDepressionFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSelf-Injurious BehaviorSelf ReportSuicideSuicide, AttemptedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcquired capabilityBehavioral forecastBelongingnessBurdensomenessNon-suicidal self-injurySuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID27344029
PMCPMC5247268
OpenAlexW2417969822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.