Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27343254›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2016

Does patient time spent viewing computer-tailored colorectal cancer screening materials predict patient-reported discussion of screening with providers?

Mechelle Sanders, Kevin Fiscella, Peter Veazie, James G Dolan, Anthony Jerant

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mechelle SandersDepartments of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA mechelle_sanders@urmc.rochester.edu.
Kevin FiscellaDepartments of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Peter VeazieDepartment of Public Health Science, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
James G DolanDepartment of Public Health Science, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Anthony JerantDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

Tailored Interactive Multimedia to Reduce Colorectal CA Screening DisparitiesR01CA131386 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI JERANT, ANTHONY FRANCIS · 2008 to 2013
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main aim is to examine whether patients' viewing time on information about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening before a primary care physician (PCP) visit is associated with discussion of screening options during the visit. We analyzed data from a multi-center randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program (IMCP) to activate patients to undergo CRC screening, deployed in primary care offices immediately before a visit. We employed usage time information stored in the IMCP to examine the association of patient time spent using the program with patient-reported discussion of screening during the visit, adjusting for previous CRC screening recommendation and reading speed.On average, patients spent 33 minutes on the program. In adjusted analyses, 30 minutes spent using the program was associated with a 41% increase in the odds of the patient having a discussion with their PCP (1.04, 1.59, 95% CI). In a separate analysis of the tailoring modules; the modules encouraging adherence to the tailored screening recommendation and discussion with the patient's PCP yielded significant results. Other predictors of screening discussion included better self-reported physical health and increased patient activation. Time spent on the program predicted greater patient-physician discussion of screening during a linked visit.Usage time information gathered automatically by IMCPs offers promise for objectively assessing patient engagement around a topic and predicting likelihood of discussion between patients and their clinician.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPatient Education as TopicAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsComputer-Assisted InstructionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27343254
PMCPMC4945861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.