Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27343183›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2017

FPOP-LC-MS/MS Suggests Differences in Interaction Sites of Amphipols and Detergents with Outer Membrane Proteins.

Thomas G Watkinson, Antonio N Calabrese, James R Ault, Sheena E Radford, Alison E Ashcroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Precursor Reagent Hydrophobicity Affects Membrane Protein Footprinting.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Diethylpyrocarbonate Footprints a Membrane Protein in Micelles.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Investigation of D76N βJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas G WatkinsonAstbury Center for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Antonio N CalabreseAstbury Center for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
James R AultAstbury Center for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Sheena E RadfordAstbury Center for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. s.e.radford@leeds.ac.uk.
Alison E AshcroftAstbury Center for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. a.e.ashcroft@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M012573/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphipols are a class of novel surfactants that are capable of stabilizing the native state of membrane proteins. They have been shown to be highly effective, in some cases more so than detergent micelles, at maintaining the structural integrity of membrane proteins in solution, and have shown promise as vehicles for delivering native membrane proteins into the gas phase for structural interrogation. Here, we use fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP), which irreversibly labels the side chains of solvent-accessible residues with hydroxyl radicals generated by laser photolysis of hydrogen peroxide, to compare the solvent accessibility of the outer membrane protein OmpT when solubilized with the amphipol A8-35 or with n-dodecyl-β-maltoside (DDM) detergent micelles. Using quantitative mass spectrometry analyses, we show that fast photochemical oxidation reveals differences in the extent of solvent accessibility of residues between the A8-35 and DDM solubilized states, providing a rationale for the increased stability of membrane proteins solubilized with amphipol compared with detergent micelles, as a result of additional intermolecular contacts. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

Bacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsChromatography, LiquidDetergentsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGlucosidesHydrogen PeroxideHydroxyl RadicalMicellesModels, MolecularOxidation-ReductionPeptide HydrolasesPhotochemical ProcessesPhotolysisPolymersPropylaminesamphipol A8-35Bacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsDetergentsdodecyl maltosideEscherichia coli ProteinsGlucosidesHydrogen PeroxideHydroxyl RadicalMicellesompT protein, E coliPeptide HydrolasesPolymersPropylaminesAmphipolsDetergentsFast photochemical oxidationMembrane proteinsStructural proteomics

Identifiers

PMID27343183
PMCPMC5174144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.