Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27343139›Full record

ArticleCryobiology2016

Polarized light scanning cryomacroscopy, part II: Thermal modeling and analysis of experimental observations.

Justin S G Feig, Prem K Solanki, David P Eisenberg, Yoed Rabin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cryobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin S G FeigBiothermal Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States. Electronic address: jsgf@custis.us.
Prem K SolankiBiothermal Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States. Electronic address: pksolank@andrew.cmu.edu.
David P EisenbergBiothermal Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States. Electronic address: deisenberg@tda.com.
Yoed RabinBiothermal Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States. Electronic address: rabin@cmu.edu.

Funding

Cryopreservation mechanisms in blood vessels using ice modulatorsR01HL127618 · NHLBI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI RABIN, YOED · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
Developing a device for visualization of large-scale cryopreservationR21RR026210 · NCRR · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI RABIN, YOED · 2010 to 2011
$309k
Developing a device for visualization of large-scale cryopreservationR21GM103407 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI RABIN, YOED · 2012 to 2012
$117k
NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR026210NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127618NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM103407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims at developing thermal analysis tools and explaining experimental observations made by means of polarized-light cryomacroscopy (Part I). Thermal modeling is based on finite elements analysis (FEA), where two model parameters are extracted from thermal measurements: (i) the overall heat transfer coefficient between the cuvette and the cooling chamber, and (ii) the effective thermal conductivity within the cryoprotective agent (CPA) at the upper part of the cryogenic temperature range. The effective thermal conductivity takes into account enhanced heat transfer due to convection currents within the CPA, creating the so-called Bénard cells. Comparison of experimental results with simulation data indicates that the uncertainty in simulations due to the propagation of uncertainty in measured physical properties exceeds the uncertainty in experimental measurements, which validates the modeling approach. It is shown in this study that while a cavity may form in the upper-center portion of the vitrified CPA, it has very little effect on estimating the temperature distribution within the domain. This cavity is driven by thermal contraction of the CPA, with the upper-center of the domain transitioning to glass last. Finally, it is demonstrated in this study that additional stresses may develop within the glass transition temperature range due to nonlinear behavior of the thermal expansion coefficient. This effect is reported here for the first time in the context of cryobiology, using the capabilities of polarized-light cryomacroscopy.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFinite Element AnalysisMicroscopy, PolarizationThermal ConductivityVitrificationCryoprotective AgentsCryomacroscopyCrystallizationFinite element analysisGlass transitionHeat transferMechanical stressPhotoelasticityPolarized lightStructural damageVitrification

Identifiers

PMID27343139
PMCPMC5420076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.