ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016
Exosomes: novel implications in diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between COX-2 -1195G>A polymorphism and gastrointestinal cancer risk: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Toward point-of-care cancer diagnostics: gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric sensors.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Corneal Extracellular Vesicles: Small Packages with a Big Impact.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Biomembrane-coated nanosystems as next-generation delivery systems for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Multiomics Analysis of Molecules Associated with Cancer in Mesenchymal-Stem-Cell-(MSC)-Derived Exosome-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Harnessing exosomes in theranostic applications: advancements and insights in gastrointestinal cancer research.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Pushing Forward the DNA Walkers in Connection with Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Extracellular vesicles and cancer stem cells: a deadly duo in tumor progression.Oncology reviews · 2024Review
- Exosomal long non-coding RNAs: novel molecules in gastrointestinal cancers' progression and diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Using omics approaches to dissect the therapeutic effects of Chinese herbal medicines on gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Opportunities and challenges of targeting c-Met in the treatment of digestive tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Article
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Potential of a Plasma Exosomal miRNAs Panel for Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Electrochemical micro-aptasensors for exosome detection based on hybridization chain reaction amplification.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2021Article
- Effects of Tumor-Derived Exosome Programmed Death Ligand 1 on Tumor Immunity and Clinical Applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Precision medicine for gastrointestinal cancer: Recent progress and future perspective.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Review
- The multifaceted roles of long noncoding RNAs in pancreatic cancer: an update on what we know.Cancer cell international · 2020Review
- c-Met and PD-L1 on Circulating Exosomes as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers for Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Annexin A1 May Induce Pancreatic Cancer Progression as a Key Player of Extracellular Vesicles Effects as Evidenced in the In Vitro MIA PaCa-2 Model System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- AACR White Paper: Shaping the Future of Cancer Prevention - A Roadmap for Advancing Science and Public Health.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmongst all cancer subtypes, gastrointestinal tumours are responsible for most cancer-related deaths. In most of the cases, the limitation of the prognosis of patients with malignant gastrointestinal tumours can be attributed to delayed diagnosis of the disease. In the last decade, secondary prevention strategies, in particular tumour screenings, have been identified to significantly improve the identification of patients with early-stage disease, leading to more effective therapeutic interventions. Therefore, new screening methods and further innovative treatment approaches may lead to an increase in progression-free and overall survival rates. PURPOSE: Exosomes are small microvesicles with a size of 50-150 nm. They are formed in the endosomal system of many different cell types, where they are packed with nucleotides and proteins from the parental cell. After their release into the extracellular space, exosomes can deliver their cargo into recipient cells. By this mechanism, tumour cells can recruit and manipulate the adjacent and systemic microenvironment in order to support invasion and dissemination. Cancer-derived exosomes in the blood may provide detailed information about the tumour biology of each individual patient. Moreover, tumour-derived exosomes can be used as targetable factors and drug delivery agents in clinical practice.
conclusionIn this review, we summarise new aspects about novel implications in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer and show how circulating exosomes have come into the spotlight of research as a high potential source of 'liquid biopsies'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.