Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27342737›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Retrotransposon Proliferation Coincident with the Evolution of Dioecy in Asparagus.

Alex Harkess, Francesco Mercati, Loredana Abbate, Michael McKain, J Chris Pires, Tea Sala, Francesco Sunseri, Agostino Falavigna, Jim Leebens-Mack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mobilome of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Practical considerations for plant phylogenomics.Applications in plant sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alex HarkessDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63132 aharkess@danforthcenter.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2035-0871
Francesco MercatiDipartimento di AGRARIA, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Salita Melissari, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, Division of Palermo, National Research Council, 900129 Palermo, Italy.
Loredana AbbateInstitute of Biosciences and BioResources, Division of Palermo, National Research Council, 900129 Palermo, Italy.
Michael McKainDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63132.
J Chris PiresDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211.
Tea SalaConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA), Research Unit for Vegetable Crops, Montanaso Lombardo, 26836 Lodi, Italy.
Francesco SunseriDipartimento di AGRARIA, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Salita Melissari, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Agostino FalavignaConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA), Research Unit for Vegetable Crops, Montanaso Lombardo, 26836 Lodi, Italy.
Jim Leebens-MackDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current phylogenetic sampling reveals that dioecy and an XY sex chromosome pair evolved once, or possibly twice, in the genus Asparagus Although there appear to be some lineage-specific polyploidization events, the base chromosome number of 2n = 2× = 20 is relatively conserved across the Asparagus genus. Regardless, dioecious species tend to have larger genomes than hermaphroditic species. Here, we test whether this genome size expansion in dioecious species is related to a polyploidization and subsequent chromosome fusion, or to retrotransposon proliferation in dioecious species. We first estimate genome sizes, or use published values, for four hermaphrodites and four dioecious species distributed across the phylogeny, and show that dioecious species typically have larger genomes than hermaphroditic species. Utilizing a phylogenomic approach, we find no evidence for ancient polyploidization contributing to increased genome sizes of sampled dioecious species. We do find support for an ancient whole genome duplication (WGD) event predating the diversification of the Asparagus genus. Repetitive DNA content of the four hermaphroditic and four dioecious species was characterized based on randomly sampled whole genome shotgun sequencing, and common elements were annotated. Across our broad phylogenetic sampling, Ty-1 Copia retroelements, in particular, have undergone a marked proliferation in dioecious species. In the absence of a detectable WGD event, retrotransposon proliferation is the most likely explanation for the precipitous increase in genome size in dioecious Asparagus species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAsparagus PlantGenome, PlantGenome SizeHermaphroditic OrganismsPolyploidyRetroelementsSex ChromosomesRetroelementsAsparagusdioecygenome sizesex chromosomestransposons

Identifiers

PMID27342737
PMCPMC5015926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.