Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27342421›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2016

Analysis of the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic of stage I invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Jizhuang Luo, Rui Wang, Baohui Han, Jie Zhang, Heng Zhao, Wentao Fang, Qingquan Luo, Jun Yang, Yunhai Yang, Lei Zhu and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jizhuang LuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Rui WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Baohui HanDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Heng ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wentao FangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qingquan LuoDepartment of Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinic Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yunhai YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Lei ZhuDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Tianxiang ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xinghua ChengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270, Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Qingyuan HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yiyang WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jiajie ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Haiquan ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. hqchen1@yahoo.com.
Shanghai Chest Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe correlations between histological, clinical features and prognosis of stage I invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) have not been thoroughly studied for its rare incidence. This study aimed to compare the prognosis among IMA with different percentage of mucinous component and the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on IMA patients.

methodsA total of 145 stage I IMA and 3536 invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma patients with R0 resection were included. Based on the percentage of mucinous pattern presented in tumor, IMA were classified into two subgroups: pure mucinous (>90 % invasive mucinous pattern) and mixed mucinous/nonmucinous (≥10 % of each histologic component). Invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinomas were classified into three subgroups: lepidic (LEP), acinar/papillary (ACN/PAP) and solid/micropapillary (SOL/MIP). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed and compared among IMA and invasive nonmucinous patients.

resultsFor IMA patients, DFS (p = 0.003) was worse for mixed mucinous/nonmucinous compared with pure mucinous subgroup, OS (p = 0.514) was not prognostically different between two groups. There were no significant difference for DFS (p = 0.428) and OS (p = 0.232) between IMA and invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. However, statistical significance were seen for DFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) between 5 major histological subgroups: LEP and pure IMA showed excellent prognosis, mixed mucinous/nonmucinous IMA and SOL/MIP subtypes presented the worst prognosis. No significant survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for IMA patients.

conclusionsMixed mucinous/nonmucinous IMA had a worse DFS compared with pure mucinous. Early stage IMA could not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateAntineoplastic AgentsAdjuvant chemotherapyClassificationInvasive mucinous adenocarcinomaNSCLCStage I

Identifiers

PMID27342421
PMCPMC11819354
OpenAlexW2468849065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.