Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27342377›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Improving outcomes in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability (EpAID) using a nurse-led intervention: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Howard Ring, Nakita Gilbert, Roxanne Hook, Adam Platt, Christopher Smith, Fiona Irvine, Cam Donaldson, Elizabeth Jones, Joanna Kelly, Adrian Mander and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Howard RingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18d Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK. har28@cam.ac.uk.
Nakita GilbertDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18d Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Roxanne HookDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18d Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Adam PlattDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18d Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Christopher SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18d Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Fiona IrvineSchool of Health and Population Science, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Cam DonaldsonYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Elizabeth JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18d Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Joanna KellyKing's Clinical Trials Unit, PO64 Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Adrian ManderMRC Biostatistics Unit Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
Caroline MurphyKing's Clinical Trials Unit, PO64 Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Mark PenningtonKings Health Economics, PO24, David Goldberg Centre, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Angela PullenEpilepsy Action, New Antsey House, Gate Way Drive, Yeadon, Leeds, LS19 7XY, UK.
Marcus RedleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18d Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Simon RoweNHS Wakefield Clinical Commissioning Group, White Rose House, West Parade, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 1LT, UK.
James WasonKing's Clinical Trials Unit, PO64 Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/104/16Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn adults with intellectual disability (ID) and epilepsy there are suggestions that improvements in management may follow introduction of epilepsy nurse-led care. However, this has not been tested in a definitive clinical trial and results cannot be generalised from general population studies as epilepsy tends to be more severe and to involve additional clinical comorbidities in adults with ID. This trial investigates whether nurses with expertise in epilepsy and ID, working proactively to a clinically defined role, can improve clinical and quality of life outcomes in the management of epilepsy within this population, compared to treatment as usual. The trial also aims to establish whether any perceived benefits represent good value for money. METHODS/

designThe EpAID clinical trial is a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of nurse-led epilepsy management versus treatment as usual. This trial aims to obtain follow-up data from 320 participants with ID and drug-resistant epilepsy. Participants are randomly assigned either to a 'treatment as usual' control or a 'defined epilepsy nurse role' active arm, according to the cluster site at which they are treated. The active intervention utilises the recently developed Learning Disability Epilepsy Specialist Nurse Competency Framework for adults with ID. Participants undergo 4 weeks of baseline data collection, followed by a minimum of 20 weeks intervention (novel treatment or treatment as usual), followed by 4 weeks of follow-up data collection. The primary outcome is seizure severity, including associated injuries and the level of distress manifest by the patient in the preceding 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include cost-utility analysis, carer strain, seizure frequency and side effects. Descriptive measures include demographic and clinical descriptors of participants and clinical services in which they receive their epilepsy management. Qualitative study of clinical interactions and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and participants' carers are also undertaken. DISCUSSION: The EpAID clinical trial is the first cluster randomised controlled trial to test possible benefits of a nurse-led intervention in adults with epilepsy and ID. This research will have important implications for ID and epilepsy services. The challenges of undertaking such a trial in this population, and the approaches to meeting these are discussed.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN96895428 version 1.1. Registered on 26 March 2013.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsNursesAdultData CollectionEpilepsyHumansIntellectual DisabilityOutcome Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSample SizeClinical trialClinical trials unitCluster trialControlled trialCost-effectivenessEpilepsyEpilepsy nurseIntellectual disabilityNurse-led interventionPragmaticQuality of lifeRandomisedTreatmentTreatment as usual

Identifiers

PMID27342377
PMCPMC4919880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.