Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27342241›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2016

Transcriptomic and metabolic responses of Staphylococcus aureus in mixed culture with Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptococcus thermophilus and Enterococcus durans in milk.

Kamila Zdenkova, Babek Alibayov, Ludmila Karamonova, Sabina Purkrtova, Renata Karpiskova, Katerina Demnerova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. ProbioticCells · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. ESKAPEE Pathogen Biofilm Control on Surfaces with ProbioticAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Transcriptomic Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamila ZdenkovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemical and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic. kamila.zdenkova@vscht.cz.
Babek AlibayovDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemical and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic. Babak.Alibayov@vscht.cz.
Ludmila KaramonovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemical and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sabina PurkrtovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemical and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Renata KarpiskovaDepartment of Bacteriology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Katerina DemnerovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemical and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic.
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague · CZVeterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a major food-borne pathogen due to the production of enterotoxin and is particularly prevalent in contaminated milk and dairy products. The lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used as biocontrol agents in fermented foods which can inhibit pathogenic flora. In our work, we investigated the influence of three strains of LAB (Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptococcus thermophilus and Enterococcus durans) on the relative expression of three enterotoxin genes (sea, sec, sell) and eight virulence and/or regulatory genes (sarA, saeS, codY, srrA, rot, hld/RNAIII, agrA/RNAII, sigB) in two S. aureus strains (MW2 and Sa1612) in TSB and reduced-fat milk (1.5 %) at 30 °C over a 24-h period. The tested LAB and S. aureus strains proved to be mutually non-competitive or only slightly competitive during co-cultivation. In addition, under the above-mentioned conditions, differential gene expression between the S. aureus MW2 and Sa1612 strains was well documented. S. aureus growth was changed in mixed culture with LAB; however, its effect on the repression of sea and sec expression correlated with production of these virulence factors. In comparison, the presence of LAB strains generally inhibited the expression of sec, sell, sarA, seaS, agrA/RNAII and hld/RNAIII genes. The effect of LAB strains presence on the expression of sea, codY, srrA, rot and sigB genes was medium, time, LAB and S. aureus strain specific. SEA and SEC production was significantly reduced in milk compared to TSB in pure culture. After the 24-h cultivation, S. aureus MW2 and Sa1612 SEC production was 187 and 331 times lower in milk compared to TSB, respectively (0.07 and 0.39 ng/mL in milk, versus 13.1 and 129.2 ng/mL in TSB, respectively). At the same time S. aureus MW2 and Sa1612 SEA production was 77 and 68 times lower in milk compared to TSB, respectively (0.99 and 0.17 ng/mL in milk, versus 76.4 and 11.5 ng/mL in TSB, respectively). This study has revealed new insights into the interaction between S. aureus and LAB (L. plantarum, S. thermophilus, E. durans) on the level of the expression and/or production of S. aureus enterotoxins, regulatory and virulence genes in different media, including milk. This study provides data which may improve the quality of food production.

Indexed as

MilkAnimalsCoculture TechniquesCulture MediaEnterococcusEnterotoxinsFood MicrobiologyGenes, RegulatorLactiplantibacillus plantarumMicrobial InteractionsStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus thermophilusTranscriptomeVirulence FactorsCulture MediaEnterotoxinsVirulence FactorsELISART-qPCRSEASECStaphylococcus aureusVirulence genes

Identifiers

PMID27342241
OpenAlexW2473748028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.