ArticleJournal of medical systems2016
Dense Annotation of Free-Text Critical Care Discharge Summaries from an Indian Hospital and Associated Performance of a Clinical NLP Annotator.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Can antiepileptic efficacy and epilepsy variables be studied from electronic health records? A review of current approaches.Seizure · 2021Pooled it
- Identification of Gender Differences in Acute Myocardial Infarction Presentation and Management at Aga Khan University Hospital-Pakistan: Natural Language Processing Application in a Dataset of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic Health Record (EHR) use in India is generally poor, and structured clinical information is mostly lacking. This work is the first attempt aimed at evaluating unstructured text mining for extracting relevant clinical information from Indian clinical records. We annotated a corpus of 250 discharge summaries from an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in India, with markups for diseases, procedures, and lab parameters, their attributes, as well as key demographic information and administrative variables such as patient outcomes. In this process, we have constructed guidelines for an annotation scheme useful to clinicians in the Indian context. We evaluated the performance of an NLP engine, Cocoa, on a cohort of these Indian clinical records. We have produced an annotated corpus of roughly 90 thousand words, which to our knowledge is the first tagged clinical corpus from India. Cocoa was evaluated on a test corpus of 50 documents. The overlap F-scores across the major categories, namely disease/symptoms, procedures, laboratory parameters and outcomes, are 0.856, 0.834, 0.961 and 0.872 respectively. These results are competitive with results from recent shared tasks based on US records. The annotated corpus and associated results from the Cocoa engine indicate that unstructured text mining is a viable method for cohort analysis in the Indian clinical context, where structured EHR records are largely absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27342107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.