Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27341818›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Exploiting expression patterns across multiple tissues to map expression quantitative trait loci.

Chaitanya R Acharya, Janice M McCarthy, Kouros Owzar, Andrew S Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chaitanya R AcharyaProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 101 Science Dr, Durham, 27708, USA.
Janice M McCarthyDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Rd, Durham, 27708, USA.
Kouros OwzarDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Rd, Durham, 27708, USA.
Andrew S AllenProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 101 Science Dr, Durham, 27708, USA. asallen@duke.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
1/3-ldentifying regulatory mutations that influence neuropsychiatric diseaseU01MH105670 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDSTEIN, DAVID B. · 2014 to 2018
$5.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS P01CA142538NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH105670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to better understand complex diseases, it is important to understand how genetic variation in the regulatory regions affects gene expression. Genetic variants found in these regulatory regions have been shown to activate transcription in a tissue-specific manner. Therefore, it is important to map the aforementioned expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) using a statistically disciplined approach that jointly models all the tissues and makes use of all the information available to maximize the power of eQTL mapping. In this context, we are proposing a score test-based approach where we model tissue-specificity as a random effect and investigate an overall shift in the gene expression combined with tissue-specific effects due to genetic variants.

resultsOur approach has 1) a distinct computational edge, and 2) comparable performance in terms of statistical power over other currently existing joint modeling approaches such as MetaTissue eQTL and eQTL-BMA. Using simulations, we show that our method increases the power to detect eQTLs when compared to a tissue-by-tissue approach and can exceed the performance, in terms of computational speed, of MetaTissue eQTL and eQTL-BMA. We apply our method to two publicly available expression datasets from normal human brains, one comprised of four brain regions from 150 neuropathologically normal samples and another comprised of ten brain regions from 134 neuropathologically normal samples, and show that by using our method and jointly analyzing multiple brain regions, we identify eQTLs within more genes when compared to three often used existing methods.

conclusionsSince we employ a score test-based approach, there is no need for parameter estimation under the alternative hypothesis. As a result, model parameters only have to be estimated once per genome, significantly decreasing computation time. Our method also accommodates the analysis of next- generation sequencing data. As an example, by modeling gene transcripts in an analogous fashion to tissues in our current formulation one would be able to test for both a variant overall effect across all isoforms of a gene as well as transcript-specific effects. We implement our approach within the R package JAGUAR, which is now available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network repository.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingQuantitative Trait LociSoftwareBrainGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansOrgan SpecificityRegression AnalysisRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcideQTL mappingMultiple tissuesScore testTissue-specificity

Identifiers

PMID27341818
PMCPMC4919894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.