Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27341765›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2016

Supporting Goal-Oriented Primary Health Care for Seniors with Complex Care Needs Using Mobile Technology: Evaluation and Implementation of the Health System Performance Research Network, Bridgepoint Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool.

Carolyn Steele Gray, Walter P Wodchis, Ross Upshur, Cheryl Cott, Brian McKinstry, Stewart Mercer, Ted E Palen, Tim Ramsay, Kednapa Thavorn, Project Collaborators And Technology Partner, QoC Health Inc

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04056663 (Health-circuit Evaluation as a Digital Support for the Management of Patients at Risk of Hospitalization), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04056663 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Health-circuit Evaluation as a Digital Support for the Management of Patients at Risk of Hospitalization

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled400ConditionsMultiple Chronic Conditions, Chronic DiseaseArmsHealth-Circuit mobile application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Carolyn Steele GrayInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. csteele@bridgepointhealth.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-0001
Project Collaborators And Technology Partner, QoC Health Inc
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAGlasgow Centre for Population Health · GBKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ARPG/07/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults experiencing multiple chronic illnesses are at high risk of hospitalization and health decline if they are unable to manage the significant challenges posed by their health conditions. Goal-oriented care approaches can provide better care for these complex patients, but clinicians find the process of ascertaining goals "too complex and too-time consuming," and goals are often not agreed upon between complex patients and their providers. The electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) mobile app and portal offers an innovative approach to creating and monitoring goal-oriented patient-care plans to improve patient self-management and shared decision-making between patients and health care providers. The ePRO tool also supports proactive patient monitoring by the patient, caregiver(s), and health care provider. It was developed with and for older adults with complex care needs as a means to improve their quality of life.

objectiveOur proposed project will evaluate the use, effectiveness, and value for money of the ePRO tool in a 12-month multicenter, randomized controlled trial in Ontario; targeting individuals 65 or over with two or more chronic conditions that require frequent health care visits to manage their health conditions.

methodsIntervention groups using the ePRO tool will be compared with control groups on measures of quality of life, patient experience, and cost-effectiveness. We will also evaluate the implementation of the tool.

resultsThe proposed project presented in this paper will be funded through the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) eHealth Innovation Partnerships Program (eHIPP) program (CIHR-348362). The expected completion date of the study is November, 2019.

conclusionsWe anticipate our program of work will support improved quality of life and patient self-management, improved patient-centered primary care delivery, and will encourage the adoption of goal-oriented care approaches across primary health care systems. We have partnered with family health teams and quality improvement organizations in Ontario to ensure that our research is practical and that findings are shared widely. We will work with our established international network to develop an implementation framework to support continued adaptation and adoption across Canada and internationally.

Indexed as

complex care needscost-effectiveness analysiseHealth/mHealth solutionsgoal-oriented carehealth outcomesimplementationpatient-centered carepragmatic trialprimary health careseniors

Identifiers

PMID27341765
PMCPMC4938886
OpenAlexW2470735918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.