ArticlePloS one2016
Estimating Exceptionally Rare Germline and Somatic Mutation Frequencies via Next Generation Sequencing.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of paternal age on new mutations and disease in the next generation.Fertility and sterility · 2022Review
- Article
- The roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 mutations, replication and fitness.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA Editing in SARS-CoV-2 Mutations, Replication and Fitness.Research square · 2022Article
- The Roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA Editing in SARS-CoV-2 Mutations, Replication and Fitness.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2022Article
- Genetic analysis of tri-allelic patterns at the CODIS STR loci.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2020Article
- Predicting the Number of Bases to Attain Sufficient Coverage in High-Throughput Sequencing Experiments.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2020Article
- Selfish mutations dysregulating RAS-MAPK signaling are pervasive in aged human testes.Genome research · 2018Article
- How does inflammation drive mutagenesis in colorectal cancer?Trends in cancer research · 2017Article
- Dynamic Variations in Genetic Integrity Accompany Changes in Cell Fate.Stem cells and development · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We used targeted next generation deep-sequencing (Safe Sequencing System) to measure ultra-rare de novo mutation frequencies in the human male germline by attaching a unique identifier code to each target DNA molecule. Segments from three different human genes (FGFR3, MECP2 and PTPN11) were studied. Regardless of the gene segment, the particular testis donor or the 73 different testis pieces used, the frequencies for any one of the six different mutation types were consistent. Averaging over the C>T/G>A and G>T/C>A mutation types the background mutation frequency was 2.6x10-5 per base pair, while for the four other mutation types the average background frequency was lower at 1.5x10-6 per base pair. These rates far exceed the well documented human genome average frequency per base pair (~10-8) suggesting a non-biological explanation for our data. By computational modeling and a new experimental procedure to distinguish between pre-mutagenic lesion base mismatches and a fully mutated base pair in the original DNA molecule, we argue that most of the base-dependent variation in background frequency is due to a mixture of deamination and oxidation during the first two PCR cycles. Finally, we looked at a previously studied disease mutation in the PTPN11 gene and could easily distinguish true mutations from the SSS background. We also discuss the limits and possibilities of this and other methods to measure exceptionally rare mutation frequencies, and we present calculations for other scientists seeking to design their own such experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.