Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27341514›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Donor-Recipient Matching for KIR Genotypes Reduces Chronic GVHD and Missing Inhibitory KIR Ligands Protect against Relapse after Myeloablative, HLA Matched Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Rehan Mujeeb Faridi, Taylor J Kemp, Poonam Dharmani-Khan, Victor Lewis, Gaurav Tripathi, Raja Rajalingam, Andrew Daly, Noureddine Berka, Jan Storek, Faisal Masood Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Editorial: NK cells in transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Liquid Biopsy, a Potential New Detection Method in Heart Allograft Rejection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rehan Mujeeb FaridiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Taylor J KempDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Poonam Dharmani-KhanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Victor LewisSection of Pediatric Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Department of Oncology and Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gaurav TripathiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-6547
Raja RajalingamImmunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Andrew DalyDepartments of Medicine and Oncology, Foothills Hospital and Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7513-1062
Noureddine BerkaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jan StorekDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Faisal Masood KhanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAFoothills Medical Centre · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be curative for many hematologic diseases. However, complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse of primary malignancy remain significant and are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Effects of killer Ig-like receptors (KIR)-influenced NK cells on HCT outcomes have been extensively pursued over the last decade. However, the relevance of the reported algorithms on HLA matched myeloablative HCT with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is used for GVHD prophylaxis remains elusive. Here we examined the role of KIR and KIR-ligands of donor-recipient pairs in modifying the outcomes of ATG conditioned HLA matched sibling and unrelated donor HCT. METHODS AND

findingsThe study cohort consisted of 281 HLA matched sibling and unrelated donor-recipient pairs of first allogeneic marrow or blood stem cell transplantation allocated into 'discovery' (135 pairs) and 'validation' (146 pairs) cohorts. High resolution HLA typing was obtained from the medical charts and KIR gene repertoires were obtained by a Luminex® based SSO method. All surviving patients were followed-up for a minimum of two years. KIR and HLA class I distributions of HCT pairs were stratified as per applicable definitions and were tested for their association with cause specific outcomes [acute GVHD grade II-IV (aGVHD), chronic GVHD needing systemic therapy (cGVHD) and relapse] using a multivariate competing risks regression model as well as with survival outcomes [relapse-free survival (RFS), cGVHD & relapse free survival (cGRFS) and overall survival (OS)] by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. A significant association between KIR genotype mismatching (KIR-B/x donor into KIR-AA recipient or vice versa) and cGVHD was found in both discovery (p = 0.001; SHR = 2.78; 95%CI: 1.50-5.17) and validation cohorts (p = 0.005; SHR = 2.61; 95%CI: 1.33-5.11). High incidence of cGVHD associated with KIR genotype mismatching was applicable to both sibling and unrelated donors and was specific to recipients who had one or two C1 bearing HLA-C epitopes (HLA-C1/x, p = 0.001; SHR = 2.40; 95%CI: 1.42-4.06). When compared with KIR genotype mismatched transplants, HLA-C1/x patients receiving grafts from KIR genotype matched donors had a significantly improved cGRFS (p = 0.013; HR = 1.62; 95%CI: 1.11-2.39). Although there was no effect of KIR genotype matching on survival outcomes, a significantly reduced incidence of relapse (p = 0.001; SHR = 0.22; 95%CI: 0.10-0.54) and improved relapse-free survival (p = 0.038; HR = 0.40; 95%CI: 0.17-0.95) was observed with one or more missing ligands for donor inhibitory KIR among the recipients of unrelated donor transplants.

conclusionsThe present study for the first time presents the beneficial effects of KIR genotype matching in reducing cGVHD in myeloablative transplant setting using HLA matched (sibling and unrelated) donors. The findings offer a clinically applicable donor selection strategy that can help control cGVHD without affecting the risk of relapse and/or identify patients at a high risk of developing cGVHD as potential candidates for preemptive therapy. The findings also affirm the beneficial effect of one or more missing inhibitory KIR ligands in the recipient in reducing relapse and improving a relapse free survival in unrelated donor transplants.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationSiblingsTransplantation ConditioningAdultAgedAnimalsAntilymphocyte SerumChronic DiseaseFemaleGenotypeGraft vs Host DiseaseHLA AntigensHumansLigandsMaleMiddle AgedAntilymphocyte SerumHLA AntigensLigandsMyeloablative AgonistsReceptors, KIR

Identifiers

PMID27341514
PMCPMC4920429
OpenAlexW2475147046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.