Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27341492›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Evaluation of Nucleic Acid Preservation Cards for West Nile Virus Testing in Dead Birds.

Leslie Foss, William K Reisen, Ying Fang, Vicki Kramer, Kerry Padgett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leslie FossCalifornia Department of Public Health, Vector-Borne Disease Section, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, Richmond, California, United States of America.
William K ReisenDavis Arbovirus Research and Training Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, 3331 VetMed3A, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Ying FangDavis Arbovirus Research and Training Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, 3331 VetMed3A, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Vicki KramerCalifornia Department of Public Health, Vector-Borne Disease Section, 1616 Capitol Avenue, MS-7307, P.O. Box 997377, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Kerry PadgettCalifornia Department of Public Health, Vector-Borne Disease Section, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, Richmond, California, United States of America.

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U50 CK000410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The California West Nile virus (WNV) Dead Bird Surveillance Program (DBSP) is an important component of WNV surveillance in the state. We evaluated FTA™ and RNASound™ cards as an alternative method for sampling dead birds for WNV molecular testing as these cards allow for more cost effective, rapid, and safer diagnostic sampling than the shipment of bird carcasses. To evaluate accuracy of results among avian sampling regimes, Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) results from FTA™ and RNASound™ cards were compared with results from kidney tissue, brain tissue, or oral swabs in lysis buffer in 2012-2013. In addition, RT-PCR results were compared with results from oral swabs tested by rapid antigen tests (RAMP™ and VecTOR™). While test results from the cards were not as sensitive as kidney tissue testing, they were more likely to provide accurate results than rapid antigen tests, and detected WNV in corvids as well as in other passerines, raptors, and waterfowl. Overall, WNV RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) scores from the cards were higher than those from tissue testing, but both card products displayed high sensitivity and specificity. American Crow samples provided the highest sensitivity. The cards also proved to be easier and more convenient vehicles for collecting and shipping samples, and in 2014 our program launched use of RNASound™ cards in the DBSP. Both FTA™ and RNASound™ products displayed 96% agreement with tissue results and are an adequate alternative sampling method for WNV dead bird testing.

Indexed as

RNA, ViralAnimalsBird DiseasesBirdsCaliforniaPublic Health SurveillanceReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityWest Nile FeverWest Nile virusRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID27341492
PMCPMC4920385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.