Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27341321›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication.

Allain-Thibeault Ferhat, Nicolas Torquet, Anne-Marie Le Sourd, Fabrice de Chaumont, Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin, Philippe Faure, Thomas Bourgeron, Elodie Ey

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Behavioral Physiology of the CNTNAP2 Knockout Mouse.HSOA trends in anatomy and physiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allain-Thibeault FerhatHuman Genetics and Cognitive Functions, University Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 3571, Institut Pasteur.
Nicolas TorquetNeurophysiology and Behavior, University Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, CNRS UMR 7102.
Anne-Marie Le SourdHuman Genetics and Cognitive Functions, University Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 3571, Institut Pasteur.
Fabrice de ChaumontBio Image Analysis, CNRS URA 2582, Institut Pasteur.
Jean-Christophe Olivo-MarinBio Image Analysis, CNRS URA 2582, Institut Pasteur.
Philippe FaureNeurophysiology and Behavior, University Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, CNRS UMR 7102.
Thomas BourgeronHuman Genetics and Cognitive Functions, University Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 3571, Institut Pasteur.
Elodie EyHuman Genetics and Cognitive Functions, University Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 3571, Institut Pasteur; elodie.ey@pasteur.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice emit ultrasonic vocalizations in different contexts throughout development and in adulthood. These vocal signals are now currently used as proxies for modeling the genetic bases of vocal communication deficits. Characterizing the vocal behavior of mouse models carrying mutations in genes associated with neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism spectrum disorders will help to understand the mechanisms leading to social communication deficits. We provide here protocols to reliably elicit ultrasonic vocalizations in pups and in adult mice. This standardization will help reduce inter-study variability due to the experimental settings. Pup isolation calls are recorded throughout development from individual pups isolated from dam and littermates. In adulthood, vocalizations are recorded during same-sex interactions (without a sexual component) by exposing socially motivated males or females to an unknown same-sex conspecific. We also provide a protocol to record vocalizations from adult males exposed to an estrus female. In this context, there is a sexual component in the interaction. These protocols are established to elicit a large amount of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory mice. However, we point out the important inter-individual variability in the vocal behavior of mice, which should be taken into account by recording a minimal number of individuals (at least 12 in each condition). These recordings of ultrasonic vocalizations are used to evaluate the call rate, the vocal repertoire and the acoustic structure of the calls. Data are combined with the analysis of synchronous video recordings to provide a more complete view on social communication in mice. These protocols are used to characterize the vocal communication deficits in mice lacking ProSAP1/Shank2, a gene associated with autism spectrum disorders. More ultrasonic vocalizations recordings can also be found on the mouseTube database, developed to favor the exchange of such data.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceUltrasonicsVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID27341321
PMCPMC4927756
OpenAlexW2412121675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.