Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27340423›Full record

ArticleNature physics2014

Forces driving epithelial wound healing.

Agustí Brugués, Ester Anon, Vito Conte, Jim H Veldhuis, Mukund Gupta, Julien Colombelli, José J Muñoz, G Wayne Brodland, Benoit Ladoux, Xavier Trepat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
184citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

184 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physical models of embryonic epithelial healing.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Statistical and mechanical analysis of multi-pseudopodial locomotion in a testate amoeba, Arcella sp.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. MechanoMR microparticle (MbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agustí Brugués *Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Ester Anon *Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Vito Conte *Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Jim H VeldhuisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Mukund GuptaMechanobiology Institute (MBI), National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Julien ColombelliInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain.
José J MuñozLaboratori de Càlcul Numèric, Department of Applied Mathematics III, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
G Wayne BrodlandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Benoit LadouxInstitut Jacques Monod (IJM), Université Paris Diderot, and Unité Mixte de Recherche 7592 CNRS, Paris, France.
Xavier TrepatInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

European Research Council 242993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental feature of multicellular organisms is their ability to self-repair wounds through the movement of epithelial cells into the damaged area. This collective cellular movement is commonly attributed to a combination of cell crawling and "purse-string" contraction of a supracellular actomyosin ring. Here we show by direct experimental measurement that these two mechanisms are insufficient to explain force patterns observed during wound closure. At early stages of the process, leading actin protrusions generate traction forces that point away from the wound, showing that wound closure is initially driven by cell crawling. At later stages, we observed unanticipated patterns of traction forces pointing towards the wound. Such patterns have strong force components that are both radial and tangential to the wound. We show that these force components arise from tensions transmitted by a heterogeneous actomyosin ring to the underlying substrate through focal adhesions. The structural and mechanical organization reported here provides cells with a mechanism to close the wound by cooperatively compressing the underlying substrate.

Identifiers

PMID27340423
PMCPMC4915550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.