Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27340260›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2017

Characterization of Pancreatic Cancer Cell Thermal Response to Heat Ablation or Cryoablation.

Kenneth W Baumann, John M Baust, Kristi K Snyder, John G Baust, Robert G Van Buskirk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cryoablation: physical and molecular basis with putative immunological consequences.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth W Baumann1 Institute of Biomedical Technology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
John M Baust1 Institute of Biomedical Technology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Kristi K Snyder1 Institute of Biomedical Technology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
John G Baust1 Institute of Biomedical Technology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Robert G Van Buskirk1 Institute of Biomedical Technology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Binghamton University · USCell Preservation Services (United States) · US

Funding

Development of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Device for the Treatment of Esophageal CancerR43CA195948 · NCI · CELL PRESERVATION SERVICES, INC. · PI BAUST, JOHN M · 2015 to 2015
$278k
FrostBite - A Unique Catheter for Endoscopic CryoablationR43CA183265 · NCI · CELL PRESERVATION SERVICES, INC. · PI BAUST, JOHN M · 2014 to 2014
$225k
NCI NIH HHS R43 CA183265NCI NIH HHS R43 CA195948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most lethal carcinomas is pancreatic cancer. As standard treatment using chemotherapy and radiation has shown limited success, thermal regimens (cryotherapy or heat ablation) are emerging as viable alternatives. Although promising, our understanding of pancreatic cancer response to thermal ablation remains limited. In this study, we investigated the thermal responses of 2 pancreatic cancer cell lines in an effort to identify the minimum lethal temperature needed for complete cell death to provide guidance for in vivo applications. PANC-1 and BxPC-3 were frozen (-10°C to -25°C) or heated (45°C-50°C) in single and repeated exposure regimes. Posttreatment survival and recovery were analyzed using alamarBlue assay over a 7-day interval. Modes of cell death were assessed using fluorescence microscopy (calcein acetoxymethyl ester/propidium iodide) and flow cytometry (YO-PRO-1/propidium iodide). Freezing to -10°C resulted in minimal cell death. Exposure to -15°C had a mild impact on PANC-1 survival (93%), whereas BxPC-3 was more severely damaged (33%). Exposure to -20°C caused a significant reduction in viability (PANC-1 = 23%; BxPC-3 = 2%) whereas -25°C yielded complete death. Double freezing exposure was more effective than single exposure. Repeat exposure to -15°C resulted in complete death of BxPC-3, whereas -20°C severely impacted PANC-1 (7%). Heating to 45°C resulted in minimum cell death. Exposure to 48°C yielded a slight increase in cell loss (PANC-1 = 85%; BxPC-3 = 98%). Exposure to 50°C caused a significant decline (PANC-1 = 70%; BxPC-3 = 9%) with continued deterioration to 0%. Double heating to 45°C resulted in similar effects observed in single exposures, whereas repeated 48°C resulted in significant increases in cell death (PANC-1 = 68%; BxPC-3 = 29%). In conclusion, we observed that pancreatic cancer cells were completely destroyed at temperatures <-25°C or >50°C using single thermal exposures. Repeated exposures resulted in increased cell death at less extreme temperatures. Our data suggest that thermal ablation strategies (heat or cryoablation) may represent a viable technique for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCryosurgeryHot TemperatureHumansHyperthermia, InducedNecrosisPancreatic Neoplasmsapoptosiscryoablationhyperthermialethal temperaturepancreatic cancerthermal therapy

Identifiers

PMID27340260
PMCPMC5616062
OpenAlexW2474910655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.