Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27340113›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2016

Recovery practice in community mental health teams: national survey.

M Leamy, E Clarke, C Le Boutillier, V Bird, R Choudhury, R MacPherson, F Pesola, K Sabas, J Williams, P Williams and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M LeamyM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK mary.leamy@kcl.ac.uk.
E ClarkeM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
C Le BoutillierM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
V BirdM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
R ChoudhuryM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
R MacPhersonM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
F PesolaM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
K SabasM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
J WilliamsM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
P WilliamsM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
M SladeM. Leamy, PhD, E. Clarke, MBBS, C. Le Boutillier, MSc, V. Bird, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London; R. Choudhury, MBBS, R. MacPherson, MBBS, gether NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester; F. Pesola, PhD, K. Sabas, BSc, J. Williams, PhD, P. Williams, MSc, M. Slade, PhD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBWildfowl & Wetlands Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is consensus about the importance of 'recovery' in mental health services, but the link between recovery orientation of mental health teams and personal recovery of individuals has been underresearched.

aimsTo investigate differences in team leader, clinician and service user perspectives of recovery orientation of community adult mental health teams in England.

methodIn six English mental health National Health Service (NHS) trusts, randomly chosen community adult mental health teams were surveyed. A random sample of ten patients, one team leader and a convenience sample of five clinicians were surveyed from each team. All respondents rated the recovery orientation of their team using parallel versions of the Recovery Self Assessment (RSA). In addition, service users also rated their own personal recovery using the Questionnaire about Processes of Recovery (QPR).

resultsTeam leaders (n = 22) rated recovery orientation higher than clinicians (n = 109) or patients (n = 120) (Wald(2) = 7.0, P = 0.03), and both NHS trust and team type influenced RSA ratings. Patient-rated recovery orientation was a predictor of personal recovery (b = 0.58, 95% CI 0.31-0.85, P<0.001). Team leaders and clinicians with experience of mental illness (39%) or supporting a family member or friend with mental illness (76%) did not differ in their RSA ratings from other team leaders or clinicians.

conclusionsCompared with team leaders, frontline clinicians and service users have less positive views on recovery orientation. Increasing recovery orientation may support personal recovery.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Mental Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID27340113
PMCPMC5046739
OpenAlexW2463216089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.