Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27339950›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Shear Stiffness of 4 Common Intracranial Tumors Measured Using MR Elastography: Comparison with Intraoperative Consistency Grading.

N Sakai, Y Takehara, S Yamashita, N Ohishi, H Kawaji, T Sameshima, S Baba, H Sakahara, H Namba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Applications of elastography in operative neurosurgery: A systematic review.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) of Skull Base Tumours: A Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

N SakaiFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (N.S., H.K., T.S., H.N.) nsakaineurosurg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7893-9323
Y TakeharaRadiology (Y.T., N.O.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-5997
S YamashitaDiagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.Y., H.S.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-183X
N OhishiRadiology (Y.T., N.O.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-4460
H KawajiFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (N.S., H.K., T.S., H.N.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-3804
T SameshimaFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (N.S., H.K., T.S., H.N.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4282-306X
S BabaDiagnostic Pathology (S.B.), Hamamatsu University Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4912-5712
H SakaharaDiagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.Y., H.S.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-633X
H NambaFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (N.S., H.K., T.S., H.N.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0653-1040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe stiffness of intracranial tumors affects the outcome of tumor removal. We evaluated the stiffness of 4 common intracranial tumors by using MR elastography and tested whether MR elastography had the potential to discriminate firm tumors preoperatively. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-four patients with meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, vestibular schwannomas, and gliomas scheduled for resection were recruited for MR elastography. On the elastogram, the mean and the maximum shear stiffnesses were measured by placing an ROI on the tumor. Blinded to the MR elastography findings, surgeons conducted qualitative intraoperative assessment of tumor consistency by using a 5-point scale. Histopathologic diagnosis was confirmed by using the resected specimens. The mean and maximum shear stiffnesses were compared with histopathologic subtypes, and the intraoperative tumor consistency was graded by the surgeons.

resultsThe mean and maximum shear stiffnesses were the following: 1.9 ± 0.8 kPa and 3.4 ± 1.5 kPa for meningiomas, 1.2 ± 0.3 kPa and 1.8 ± 0.5 kPa for pituitary adenomas, 2.0 ± 0.4 kPa and 2.7 ± 0.8 kPa for vestibular schwannomas, and 1.5 ± 0.2 kPa and 2.7 ± 0.8 kPa for gliomas. The mean and maximum shear stiffnesses for meningiomas were higher than those of pituitary adenomas (

conclusionsMR elastography could evaluate intracranial tumors on the basis of their physical property of shear stiffness. MR elastography may be useful in discriminating firm tumors preoperatively.

Identifiers

PMID27339950
PMCPMC7960472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.