Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27339860›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Evaluation of surrogate tissues as indicators of drug activity in a melanoma skin model.

Palak R Parekh, Rohini Choudhuri, Urbain Weyemi, Olga A Martin, William M Bonner, Christophe E Redon

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Palak R ParekhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Greenbaum Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Rohini ChoudhuriGenomic Integrity Group, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland.
Urbain WeyemiGenomic Integrity Group, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland.
Olga A MartinGenomic Integrity Group, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland.
William M BonnerGenomic Integrity Group, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland.
Christophe E RedonGenomic Integrity Group, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of novel cancer treatments is a challenging task, partly because results from model systems often fail to predict drug efficacy in humans, and also tumors are often inaccessible for biochemical analysis, preventing effective monitoring of drug activity in vivo. Utilizing a model system, we evaluated the use of drug-induced DNA damage in surrogate tissues as indicators of drug efficacy. Samples of a commercially available melanoma skin model (Mattek MLNM-FT-A375) containing keratinocyte and fibroblast layers with melanoma nodules were subjected to various chemotherapeutic regimens for one, four, or eight days. At these times they were analyzed for DNA double-stranded breaks (γH2AX foci) and apoptosis (TUNEL). A wide range of drug responses in both tumor and normal tissues were observed and cataloged. For the melanoma, the most common drug response was apoptosis. The basal keratinocyte layer, which was the most reliable indicator of drug response in the melanoma skin model, responded with γH2AX foci formation that was abrupt and transient. The relationships between tumor and surrogate tissue drug responses are complex, indicating that while surrogate tissue drug responses may be useful clinical tools, careful control of variables such as the timing of sampling may be important in interpreting the results.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisDNA DamageDNA, NeoplasmDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansKeratinocytesMelanomaMutagensSkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsDNA, NeoplasmMutagensApoptosisdrug responsemelanoma tissue modelsurrogate tissueγH2 AX

Identifiers

PMID27339860
PMCPMC4971901
OpenAlexW2464271673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.