Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27339629›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2016

Misdiagnosis of narcolepsy.

Laura Dunne, Pallavi Patel, Emily L Maschauer, Ian Morrison, Renata L Riha

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Central disorders of hypersomnolence: diagnostic discrepancies between military and civilian sleep centers.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnosing narcolepsy in the active duty military population.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2021
    Article
  12. Impact of parental injury on adolescent sleep.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Red Flags for early referral of people with symptoms suggestive of narcolepsy: a report from a national multidisciplinary panel.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Missed diagnosis of longstanding narcolepsy.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura DunneSleep Research Unit, Department of Sleep Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Pallavi PatelDepartment of Neurology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Emily L MaschauerSleep Research Unit, Department of Sleep Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Ian MorrisonSleep Research Unit, Department of Sleep Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Renata L RihaSleep Research Unit, Department of Sleep Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. rlriha@hotmail.com.
University of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBNinewells Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNarcolepsy is a chronic primary sleep disorder, characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep dysfunction with or without cataplexy. Narcolepsy is uncommon, with a low prevalence rate which makes it difficult to diagnose definitively without a complex series of tests and a detailed history. The aim of this study was to review patients referred to a tertiary sleep centre who had been labelled with a diagnosis of narcolepsy prior to referral in order to assess if the diagnosis was accurate, and if not, to determine the cause of diagnostic misattribution.

methodsAll patients seen at a sleep centre from 2007-2013 (n = 551) who underwent detailed objective testing including an MSLT PSG, as well as wearing an actigraphy watch and completing a sleep diary for 2 weeks, were assessed for a pre-referral and final diagnosis of narcolepsy.

resultsOf the 41 directly referred patients with a diagnostic label of narcolepsy, 19 (46 %) were subsequently confirmed to have narcolepsy on objective testing and assessment by a sleep physician using ICSD-2 criteria.

conclusionsThe diagnosis of narcolepsy was incorrectly attributed to almost 50 % of patients labelled with a diagnosis of narcolepsy who were referred for further opinion by a variety of specialists and generalists. Accurate diagnosis of narcolepsy is critical for many reasons, such as the impact it has on quality of life, driving, employment, insurance and pregnancy in women as well as medication management.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsAdultAgedCatalepsyCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcolepsyPolysomnographyReferral and ConsultationSex FactorsSleep LatencyYoung AdultCataplexyDiagnosisMisdiagnosisMSLTNarcolepsy

Identifiers

PMID27339629
PMCPMC5155023
OpenAlexW2466715589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.