Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27339622›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

The German linguistic validation of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ).

Dominik Abt, Kristina Dötzer, Patrick Honek, Karolina Müller, Daniel Stephan Engeler, Maximilian Burger, Hans-Peter Schmid, Thomas Knoll, Francesco Sanguedolce, Hrishi B Joshi and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measurements for urolithiasis: a COSMIN-based systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominik AbtDepartment of Urology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Kristina DötzerDepartment of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Patrick HonekDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Sindelfingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Karolina MüllerCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel Stephan EngelerDepartment of Urology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Maximilian BurgerDepartment of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hans-Peter SchmidDepartment of Urology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Thomas KnollDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Sindelfingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Francesco SanguedolceDepartment of Urology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Hrishi B JoshiDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Hans-Martin FritscheDepartment of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. hans-martin.fritsche@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-4303
Kantonsspital St. Gallen · CHKlinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe developed and validated the German version of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) for male and female patients with indwelling ureteral stents.

methodsThe German version of the USSQ was developed following a well-established multistep process. A total of 101 patients with indwelling ureteral stents completed the German USSQ as well as the validated questionnaires International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) or International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Patients completed questionnaires at 1 and 2-4 weeks after stent insertion and 4 weeks after stent removal. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the psychometric properties of the questionnaire.

resultsThe German version of the USSQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .72-.88) and test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .81-.92]. Inter-domain associations within the USSQ showed substantial correlations between different USSQ domains, indicating a high conceptual relationship of the domains. Except from urinary symptoms and general quality of life, German USSQ showed good convergent validity with the corresponding validated questionnaires. All USSQ domains showed significant sensitivity to change (p ≤ .001).

conclusionThe new German version of the USSQ proved to be a reliable and robust instrument for the evaluation of ureteral stent-associated morbidity for both male and female patients. It is expected to be a valid outcome measure in the future stent research.

Indexed as

StentsAdultDysuriaFemaleHematuriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsUreterUrinary IncontinenceDJ stentGerman validationQuality of lifeQuestionnairesUreterUSSQ

Identifiers

PMID27339622
OpenAlexW2464249700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.