Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27339115›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2016

Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial.

David Dearnaley, Isabel Syndikus, Helen Mossop, Vincent Khoo, Alison Birtle, David Bloomfield, John Graham, Peter Kirkbride, John Logue, Zafar Malik and 20 more

Erratum issued 10 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 649 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
649citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
92.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00392535 naunknown statusnot on this map

Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: CHHIP

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Cancer Research, United KingdomRan2002 to 2021Enrolled3,216ConditionsProstate CancerArmsconventional radiotherapy 74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions, hypofractionated radiation therapy 60 Gy in 20 fractions, hypofractionated radiation therapy 57 Gy in 19 fractions
NCT03254420 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins. (RCMIGI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2016 to 2028Enrolled74ConditionsProstate CancerArmsCalypso beacon implant, moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy
NCT03388619 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I Trial of Highly Conformal, Hypofractionated, Focally Dose Escalated Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2018 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsCancer Of Prostate, Prostate Neoplasms, Prostate Cancer, Neoplasms of ProstateArmsProstate bed with integrated boost, Prostate bed irradiation only, Whole Body Bone Scan, 18F-NaF PET Imaging, CT
NCT04004312 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Single Fractions SBRT in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Phase I Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFabio CuryRan2018 to 2027Enrolled12ConditionsProstate CancerArmsStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
NCT04004858 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Acute Rectal Toxicity for Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy - An Multi-institution Pilot Study of Reduced PTV Margin

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouthlake HealthRan2019 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsProstate CancerArmsExternal beam radiation therapy
NCT04535908 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Study to Evaluate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients Aged 75 Years or Older.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of GrazRan2020 to 2022Enrolled23ConditionsProstate Cancer, Radiotherapy Side EffectArmsHypofractionated radiotherapy
NCT05936736 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

24 Gy in One Fraction Urethral-sparing "High-Dose-Rate Like" Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy for Prostate Cancer: a Single-center Non-randomized Prospective Clinical Study (PRO-FAST)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2023 to 2030Enrolled70ConditionsLocalized Prostate CarcinomaArmsprostate SBRT
NCT06027892 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Two-fraction Versus Five-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Low- and Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: SABR-Dual

TypeinterventionalSponsorRabin Medical CenterRan2022 to 2032Enrolled562ConditionsPROSTATE CANCERArmsTwo-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy, Five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy
NCT06546267 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Advanced Radiotherapy (ART) in Prostate Cancer Patients With Early Stage, Advanced, Metastatic and Relapsed Disease (PROST-ART)

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2022 to 2027Enrolled2,500ConditionsProstate CancerArmsImage Guided Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
NCT07674225 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Dose dE-eScalaTion IN prostATe radIOtherapy usiNg an MR-Linac in 2 Fractions - a Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2026 to 2030Enrolled24ConditionsIntermediate Risk Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), Prostate CancerArmsProstate radical radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

649 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

589 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

David DearnaleyThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: David.Dearnaley@icr.ac.uk.
Isabel SyndikusClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
Helen MossopThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Vincent KhooThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alison BirtleRosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK.
David BloomfieldBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.
John GrahamBeacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.
Peter KirkbrideSheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
John LogueChristie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Zafar MalikClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
Julian Money-KyrleRoyal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Joe M O'SullivanQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Miguel PanadesLincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK.
Chris ParkerThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Helen PattersonAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Christopher ScraseIpswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK.
John StaffurthCardiff University/Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Andrew StockdaleUniversity Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK.
Jean TremlettBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.
Margaret BidmeadRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Helen MaylesClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
Olivia NaismithRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Chris SouthRoyal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Annie GaoThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Clare CruickshankThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Shama HassanThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Julia PughThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Clare GriffinThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Emma HallThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
CHHiP Investigators
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBIpswich Hospital · GBLincoln County Hospital · GBMusgrove Park Hospital · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBRoyal Preston Hospital · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Christie Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Coventry · GBVelindre Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10588Cancer Research UK 12518Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 7253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer might have high radiation-fraction sensitivity that would give a therapeutic advantage to hypofractionated treatment. We present a pre-planned analysis of the efficacy and side-effects of a randomised trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy after 5 years follow-up.

methodsCHHiP is a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial that recruited men with localised prostate cancer (pT1b-T3aN0M0). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to conventional (74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions over 7·4 weeks) or one of two hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks or 57 Gy in 19 fractions over 3·8 weeks) all delivered with intensity-modulated techniques. Most patients were given radiotherapy with 3-6 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen suppression. Randomisation was by computer-generated random permuted blocks, stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group and radiotherapy treatment centre, and treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical or clinical failure; the critical hazard ratio (HR) for non-inferiority was 1·208. Analysis was by intention to treat. Long-term follow-up continues. The CHHiP trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN97182923.

findingsBetween Oct 18, 2002, and June 17, 2011, 3216 men were enrolled from 71 centres and randomly assigned (74 Gy group, 1065 patients; 60 Gy group, 1074 patients; 57 Gy group, 1077 patients). Median follow-up was 62·4 months (IQR 53·9-77·0). The proportion of patients who were biochemical or clinical failure free at 5 years was 88·3% (95% CI 86·0-90·2) in the 74 Gy group, 90·6% (88·5-92·3) in the 60 Gy group, and 85·9% (83·4-88·0) in the 57 Gy group. 60 Gy was non-inferior to 74 Gy (HR 0·84 [90% CI 0·68-1·03], pNI=0·0018) but non-inferiority could not be claimed for 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy (HR 1·20 [0·99-1·46], pNI=0·48). Long-term side-effects were similar in the hypofractionated groups compared with the conventional group. There were no significant differences in either the proportion or cumulative incidence of side-effects 5 years after treatment using three clinician-reported as well as patient-reported outcome measures. The estimated cumulative 5 year incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse bowel and bladder adverse events was 13·7% (111 events) and 9·1% (66 events) in the 74 Gy group, 11·9% (105 events) and 11·7% (88 events) in the 60 Gy group, 11·3% (95 events) and 6·6% (57 events) in the 57 Gy group, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

interpretationHypofractionated radiotherapy using 60 Gy in 20 fractions is non-inferior to conventional fractionation using 74 Gy in 37 fractions and is recommended as a new standard of care for external-beam radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer.

fundingCancer Research UK, Department of Health, and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationAgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternational AgenciesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRisk FactorsSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27339115
PMCPMC4961874
OpenAlexW2465092116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 4 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.