Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2016
Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 649 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: CHHIP
Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins. (RCMIGI)
A Phase I Trial of Highly Conformal, Hypofractionated, Focally Dose Escalated Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy
Single Fractions SBRT in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Phase I Study
Reducing Acute Rectal Toxicity for Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy - An Multi-institution Pilot Study of Reduced PTV Margin
Clinical Study to Evaluate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients Aged 75 Years or Older.
24 Gy in One Fraction Urethral-sparing "High-Dose-Rate Like" Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy for Prostate Cancer: a Single-center Non-randomized Prospective Clinical Study (PRO-FAST)
Two-fraction Versus Five-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Low- and Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: SABR-Dual
Efficacy of Advanced Radiotherapy (ART) in Prostate Cancer Patients With Early Stage, Advanced, Metastatic and Relapsed Disease (PROST-ART)
Dose dE-eScalaTion IN prostATe radIOtherapy usiNg an MR-Linac in 2 Fractions - a Randomised Trial
Who cites it
649 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,289 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducing adverse effects in hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Clinical evidence and emerging mitigation strategies.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Correlation of Biochemical Recurrence With Adverse Late Toxic Events Following Prostate Radiation Therapy (COBALT Study): An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Trials.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).The breast journal · 2026Pooled it
- Does biodegradable peri-rectal spacer mitigate treatment toxicities in radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Guideline
- The interplay between acute and late toxicity among patients receiving prostate radiotherapy: an individual patient data meta-analysis of six randomised trials.The Lancet. Oncology · 2025Pooled it
- MRI software and cognitive fusion biopsies in people with suspected prostate cancer: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Image-guided moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of a phase II trial.Journal of radiation research · 2026Trial
- Aglatimagene besadenovec (CAN-2409) with radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Magnetic resonance-guided simultaneous multi-focal adaptive radiotherapy for prostate, pElvis & metastases (MRgSMART-PEM) in prostate cancer: a prospective phase II study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Comprehensive one-day management of prostate cancer patients: PRO-FAST single-fraction ablative, urethral-sparing, HDR-like, robotic SBRT.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Intensity-modulated moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-C): early toxicity results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2025Trial
- Phase 3 Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2024Trial
- Long-Term Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0415: A Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Trial
- A Japanese multi-institutional phase II study of moderate hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image-guided technique for prostate cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Trial
- Moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of a phase II trial.Journal of radiation research · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Early adverse events and patient-reported outcomes after salvage radiotherapy following prostatectomy according to fractionation schedule: Interim analysis of the phase III URONCOR 06-24 trial.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
589 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
30 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer might have high radiation-fraction sensitivity that would give a therapeutic advantage to hypofractionated treatment. We present a pre-planned analysis of the efficacy and side-effects of a randomised trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy after 5 years follow-up.
methodsCHHiP is a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial that recruited men with localised prostate cancer (pT1b-T3aN0M0). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to conventional (74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions over 7·4 weeks) or one of two hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks or 57 Gy in 19 fractions over 3·8 weeks) all delivered with intensity-modulated techniques. Most patients were given radiotherapy with 3-6 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen suppression. Randomisation was by computer-generated random permuted blocks, stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group and radiotherapy treatment centre, and treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical or clinical failure; the critical hazard ratio (HR) for non-inferiority was 1·208. Analysis was by intention to treat. Long-term follow-up continues. The CHHiP trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN97182923.
findingsBetween Oct 18, 2002, and June 17, 2011, 3216 men were enrolled from 71 centres and randomly assigned (74 Gy group, 1065 patients; 60 Gy group, 1074 patients; 57 Gy group, 1077 patients). Median follow-up was 62·4 months (IQR 53·9-77·0). The proportion of patients who were biochemical or clinical failure free at 5 years was 88·3% (95% CI 86·0-90·2) in the 74 Gy group, 90·6% (88·5-92·3) in the 60 Gy group, and 85·9% (83·4-88·0) in the 57 Gy group. 60 Gy was non-inferior to 74 Gy (HR 0·84 [90% CI 0·68-1·03], pNI=0·0018) but non-inferiority could not be claimed for 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy (HR 1·20 [0·99-1·46], pNI=0·48). Long-term side-effects were similar in the hypofractionated groups compared with the conventional group. There were no significant differences in either the proportion or cumulative incidence of side-effects 5 years after treatment using three clinician-reported as well as patient-reported outcome measures. The estimated cumulative 5 year incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse bowel and bladder adverse events was 13·7% (111 events) and 9·1% (66 events) in the 74 Gy group, 11·9% (105 events) and 11·7% (88 events) in the 60 Gy group, 11·3% (95 events) and 6·6% (57 events) in the 57 Gy group, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
interpretationHypofractionated radiotherapy using 60 Gy in 20 fractions is non-inferior to conventional fractionation using 74 Gy in 37 fractions and is recommended as a new standard of care for external-beam radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer.
fundingCancer Research UK, Department of Health, and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.