Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27338950›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology letters2016

Marine phage genomics: the tip of the iceberg.

Blanca Perez Sepulveda, Tamsin Redgwell, Branko Rihtman, Frances Pitt, David J Scanlan, Andrew Millard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. mSystems · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Phage Therapy with a Focus on the Human Microbiota.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  14. Bacteriophages in Natural and Artificial Environments.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Viruses · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Blanca Perez SepulvedaSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Tamsin RedgwellSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Branko RihtmanSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Frances PittSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
David J ScanlanSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Andrew MillardWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK a.d.millard@warwick.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine viruses are the most abundant biological entity in the oceans, the majority of which infect bacteria and are known as bacteriophages. Yet, the bulk of bacteriophages form part of the vast uncultured dark matter of the microbial biosphere. In spite of the paucity of cultured marine bacteriophages, it is known that marine bacteriophages have major impacts on microbial population structure and the biogeochemical cycling of key elements. Despite the ecological relevance of marine bacteriophages, there are relatively few isolates with complete genome sequences. This minireview focuses on knowledge gathered from these genomes put in the context of viral metagenomic data and highlights key advances in the field, particularly focusing on genome structure and auxiliary metabolic genes.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralMetagenomicsOceans and SeasBacteriaBacteriophagesPhylogenySeawaterbacteriophagegenomicsmarine

Identifiers

PMID27338950
PMCPMC4928673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.