Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27338881›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Smoking and serum vitamin D in older Chinese people: cross-sectional analysis based on the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.

C Q Jiang, Y H Chan, L Xu, Y L Jin, T Zhu, W S Zhang, K K Cheng, T H Lam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

C Q JiangGuangzhou No 12 Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Y H ChanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
L XuSchool of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Y L JinGuangzhou No 12 Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
T ZhuGuangzhou No 12 Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
W S ZhangGuangzhou No 12 Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
K K ChengInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
T H LamDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Twelfth Guangzhou City People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudies on serum vitamin D in smokers showed conflicting results. We examined the association of smoking status with serum vitamin D in older Chinese men, taking advantage of a community-based sample with natural exposure to vitamin D.

designCross-sectional study based on the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study (GBCS).

settingCommunity-based sample from the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.

participants612 male participants aged 50+years recruited from 2009 to 2011.

resultsThe mean (SD) of vitamin D concentration was 58.3 (17.2), 57.0 (15.0) and 54.7 (15.4) nmol/L for never, former and current smokers, respectively. Adjusted for multiple confounders, vitamin D decreased from never to former, then to current smokers (P for trend 0.02). Compared to never smokers, current smokers had lower serum concentrations of vitamin D, and the concentrations decreased with the increasing number of cigarettes per day (-3.11 (95% CI -9.05 to 2.82), -3.29 (-8.3 to 1.72) and -4.61 (-8.89 to -0.33) for 1-9, 10-19 and 20+cigarettes per day, respectively; p for trend 0.01), duration of smoking (-1.39 (-6.09 to 3.30) and -5.39 (-9.42 to -1.35) for 1-39 and 40+years, respectively; p for trend 0.008) as well as pack-years (-2.89 (-6.78 to 1.01) and -5.58 (-10.48 to -0.67) for 1-39 and 40+pack-years, respectively; p for trend 0.009). Longer duration of quitting smoking was associated with higher vitamin D than was current smoking (P for trend 0.04).

conclusionsCurrent smokers had lower vitamin D than never smokers, and the association showed a dose-response pattern.

Indexed as

AgedAsian PeopleBiological Specimen BanksChinaCigarette SmokingCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsVitamin DVitamin DOlder peopleSmokingVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID27338881
PMCPMC4932269
OpenAlexW2471776610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.