ArticleBiosensors2016
Rapid Detection of Food Allergens by Microfluidics ELISA-Based Optical Sensor.
Article in Biosensors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Potential of Fibulin2 as a therapeutic target against cancer and as a diagnostic marker (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Antibody-based alternatives to animal testing for toxin detection and antitoxin evaluation.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Review
- Ensuring food safety: Microfluidic-based approaches for the detection of food contaminants.Analytical science advances · 2024Review
- Development of nucleocapsid-specific monoclonal antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 and their ELISA diagnostics on an automatic microfluidic device.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2023Article
- Enhancement of Molecular Transport into Film Stacked Structures for Micro-Immunoassay by Unsteady Rotation.Micromachines · 2023Article
- MicroLED biosensor with colloidal quantum dots and smartphone detection.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Portable high-throughput multimodal immunoassay platform for rapid on-site COVID-19 diagnostics.Analytica chimica acta · 2023Article
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay: Types and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- An Ultrasensitive Silicon-Based Electrolyte-Gated Transistor for the Detection of Peanut Allergens.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Lab-on-a-chip technologies for food safety, processing, and packaging applications: a review.Environmental chemistry letters · 2022Review
- Development of Multiplex PCR Coupled DNA Chip Technology for Assessment of Endogenous and Exogenous Allergens in GM Soybean.Biosensors · 2021Article
- Development of a Diagnostic Biosensor Method of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis towards a Point-of-Care Biosensor.Biosensors · 2021Article
- Study on Electrical Performance of a U-Type Microfluidic Acceleration Switch Using Salt Solution as the Sensitive Electrode.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Gold-on-glass microwave split-ring resonators with PDMS microchannels for differential measurement in microfluidic sensing.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- A Capillary-Perfused, Nanocalorimeter Platform for Thermometric Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay with Femtomole Sensitivity.Biosensors · 2020Article
- Accessible Telemedicine Diagnostics with ELISA in a 3D Printed Pipette Tip.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Emerging Point-of-care Technologies for Food Safety Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- The current application of nanotechnology in food and agriculture.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2019Review
- An All-Glass Microfluidic Network with Integrated Amorphous Silicon Photosensors for on-Chip Monitoring of Enzymatic Biochemical Assay.Biosensors · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risks associated with the presence of hidden allergens in food have increased the need for rapid, sensitive, and reliable methods for tracing food allergens in commodities. Conventional enzyme immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has usually been performed in a centralized lab, requiring considerable time and sample/reagent consumption and expensive detection instruments. In this study, a microfluidic ELISA platform combined with a custom-designed optical sensor was developed for the quantitative analysis of the proteins wheat gluten and Ara h 1. The developed microfluidic ELISA biosensor reduced the total assay time from hours (up to 3.5 h) to 15-20 min and decreased sample/reagent consumption to 5-10 μL, compared to a few hundred microliters in commercial ELISA kits, with superior sensitivity. The quantitative capability of the presented biosensor is a distinctive advantage over the commercially available rapid methods such as lateral flow devices (LFD) and dipstick tests. The developed microfluidic biosensor demonstrates the potential for sensitive and less-expensive on-site determination for rapidly detecting food allergens in a complex sample system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.