Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27338463›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2016

Flavonoids, Flavonoid Subclasses, and Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies.

Lingling Cui, Xinxin Liu, Yalan Tian, Chen Xie, Qianwen Li, Han Cui, Changqing Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Açaí (TheScientificWorldJournal · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lingling CuiCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China. cuilingling0613@163.com.
Xinxin LiuCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China. suyingliu7777@163.com.
Yalan TianCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China. lhk0829@163.com.
Chen XieCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China. xcdn2227@126.com.
Qianwen LiCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China. 13526729983@163.com.
Han CuiCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China. zhuxic@126.com.
Changqing SunCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China. suncq@zzu.edu.cn.
Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flavonoids have been suggested to play a chemopreventive role in carcinogenesis. However, the epidemiologic studies assessing dietary intake of flavonoids and esophageal cancer risk have yielded inconsistent results. This study was designed to examine the association between flavonoids, each flavonoid subclass, and the risk of esophageal cancer with a meta-analysis approach. We searched for all relevant studies with a prospective cohort or case-control study design published from January 1990 to April 2016, using PUBMED, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed or random-effect models. In total, seven articles including 2629 cases and 481,193 non-cases were selected for the meta-analysis. Comparing the highest-intake patients with the lowest-intake patients for total flavonoids and for each flavonoid subclass, we found that anthocyanidins (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49-0.74), flavanones (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.86), and flavones (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95) were inversely associated with the risk of esophageal cancer. However, total flavonoids showed marginal association with esophageal cancer risk (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.59-1.04). In conclusion, our study suggested that dietary intake of total flavonoids, anthocyanidins, flavanones, and flavones might reduce the risk of esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

DietAnthocyaninsEpidemiologic StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFlavanonesFlavonesFlavonoidsHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnthocyaninsFlavanonesFlavonesFlavonoidsesophageal cancerflavonoidsmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID27338463
PMCPMC4924191
OpenAlexW2410549241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.