Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27338146›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2016

Knowledge Author: facilitating user-driven, domain content development to support clinical information extraction.

William Scuba, Melissa Tharp, Danielle Mowery, Eugene Tseytlin, Yang Liu, Frank A Drews, Wendy W Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Formal representation of patients' care context data: the path to improving the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Knowledge Discovery from Posts in Online Health Communities Using Unified Medical Language System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William ScubaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Melissa TharpDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Danielle MoweryDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Eugene TseytlinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206, USA.
Yang LiuUniversity of California, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA.
Frank A DrewsDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Wendy W ChapmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. wendy.chapman@utah.edu.

Funding

Interactive Search and Review of Clinical Records with Multi-Layered Semantic AnnotationsR01LM010964 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CHAPMAN, WENDY W., HWA, REBECCA · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems require a semantic schema comprised of domain-specific concepts, their lexical variants, and associated modifiers to accurately extract information from clinical texts. An NLP system leverages this schema to structure concepts and extract meaning from the free texts. In the clinical domain, creating a semantic schema typically requires input from both a domain expert, such as a clinician, and an NLP expert who will represent clinical concepts created from the clinician's domain expertise into a computable format usable by an NLP system. The goal of this work is to develop a web-based tool, Knowledge Author, that bridges the gap between the clinical domain expert and the NLP system development by facilitating the development of domain content represented in a semantic schema for extracting information from clinical free-text.

resultsKnowledge Author is a web-based, recommendation system that supports users in developing domain content necessary for clinical NLP applications. Knowledge Author's schematic model leverages a set of semantic types derived from the Secondary Use Clinical Element Models and the Common Type System to allow the user to quickly create and modify domain-related concepts. Features such as collaborative development and providing domain content suggestions through the mapping of concepts to the Unified Medical Language System Metathesaurus database further supports the domain content creation process. Two proof of concept studies were performed to evaluate the system's performance. The first study evaluated Knowledge Author's flexibility to create a broad range of concepts. A dataset of 115 concepts was created of which 87 (76 %) were able to be created using Knowledge Author. The second study evaluated the effectiveness of Knowledge Author's output in an NLP system by extracting concepts and associated modifiers representing a clinical element, carotid stenosis, from 34 clinical free-text radiology reports using Knowledge Author and an NLP system, pyConText. Knowledge Author's domain content produced high recall for concepts (targeted findings: 86 %) and varied recall for modifiers (certainty: 91 % sidedness: 80 %, neurovascular anatomy: 46 %).

conclusionKnowledge Author can support clinical domain content development for information extraction by supporting semantic schema creation by domain experts.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesNatural Language ProcessingSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceData MiningInternetSemanticsInformation extractionKnowledge representationNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsUnified Medical Language System

Identifiers

PMID27338146
PMCPMC4919842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.