Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27337976›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2017

Effect of mouthwashes on the composition and metabolic activity of oral biofilms grown in vitro.

Mercedes Fernandez Y Mostajo, Rob A M Exterkate, Mark J Buijs, Wim Crielaard, Egija Zaura

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The quorum quenching enzyme Aii20J modifiesFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mercedes Fernandez Y MostajoDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Free University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. M.Fernandez.y.Mostajo@acta.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-3015
Rob A M ExterkateDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Free University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark J BuijsDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Free University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim CrielaardDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Free University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Egija ZauraDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Free University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of an oxygenating mouthwash compared to two other established mouthwash products on bacterial composition and metabolic activity of oral biofilms in vitro. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwelve healthy subjects participated as donors. Plaque-saliva mixture inoculated biofilms were grown and treated with 3 different chemotherapeutic mouthwashes [amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (MD), oxygenating agent (AX), chlorhexidine 0.12 % (PA), and water (W)]. Effects of treatments were assessed on biofilm composition (16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing), production of organic acids (formate, acetate, lactate, propionate, butyrate using capillary electrophoresis), and viability of the remaining biofilm (CFUs).

resultsMicrobial profiles of biofilms clustered per inoculum donor and were dominated by the genera Veillonella, Streptococcus, and Prevotella. Microbial diversity was only reduced after PA treatment. Significant changes in composition occurred after treatment with AX, resulting in lower proportions of Veillonella and higher proportions of non-mutans streptococci. Production of all organic acids after PA and lactate after MD was significantly lower as compared to W. AX resulted in reduction of acetate, butyrate, and propionate and increase in lactate production (p < 0.05). Viable counts were significantly lower after PA and AX treatments compared to W, while no significant reduction was observed after MD.

conclusionsAll studied mouthwashes affected the in vitro biofilms differently. The effects of the AX treatment were the most prominent which resulted in changes of the bacterial composition and metabolism. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Awareness by the dental team that mouthwashes can change the bacterial composition and metabolism is important when advising its use.

Indexed as

AdultAminesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBiofilmsChlorhexidineDrug CombinationsFemaleFluorides, TopicalHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMetagenomeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMouthwashesOxidantsamine fluoride solutionAminesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineDrug CombinationsFluorides, TopicalMeridolMouthwashesOxidantsTin FluoridesAntimicrobialsBiofilmMicrocosmMouthwashesOrganic acids

Identifiers

PMID27337976
PMCPMC5399055
OpenAlexW2463906988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.