Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27337944›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

Non-primary breast malignancies: a single institution's experience of a diagnostic challenge with important therapeutic consequences-a retrospective study.

Florian E Buisman, Linda van Gelder, Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers, Bob H C Bisschops, Peter W Plaisier, Pieter J Westenend

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Occult breast cancer in an older woman: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unusual Male Breast Lesions.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Breast metastases in advanced rectal cancer: a case report.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Florian E BuismanDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. f.buisman@erasmusmc.com.
Linda van GelderDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Marian B E Menke-PluijmersDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Bob H C BisschopsDepartment of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter W PlaisierDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Pieter J WestenendLaboratory of Pathology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is a common malignancy, but metastases to the breast of extramammary malignancies are very rare. Treatment and prognosis are different. The aim of the study is to report the incidence of lymphomas and metastases to the breast of extramammary malignancies in our 30-year archive.

methodsThe pathology database of a single institute was reviewed for all breast neoplasms which were coded in our system as a metastasis in the period 1985-2014. Metastatic tumors from primary breast carcinoma were excluded.

resultsA total of 47 patients were included (7 men/40 women, mean age 63 years). The majority originated from lymphoma (n = 18) and primary melanoma (n = 11). Other primary tumor sites included the ovary (n = 6), lung (n = 6), colon (n = 3), kidney (n = 1), stomach (n = 1), and chorion (n = 1). In 24/47 patients (51 %), metastasis was the first sign of the specific malignant disease. In seven patients (15 %) surgery was performed, the diagnosis of metastatic disease was adjusted in four patients (9 %) postoperatively.

conclusionsIt is important to distinguish lymphomas and metastases to the breast from common primary breast carcinoma for proper treatment and prognosis. Therefore, we emphasize the need for a histological or cytopathological diagnosis before any treatment is commenced. The pathologist plays a key role in considering the diagnosis of metastasis if the histological features are unusual for a primary breast carcinoma. The pathologist should therefore be properly informed by the clinical physician although lymphomas and metastases to the breast are the first presentation of malignant disease in half the cases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBreastMalignanciesMetastases

Identifiers

PMID27337944
PMCPMC4918012
OpenAlexW2462191770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.