Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27337553›Full record

ArticleBiodemography and social biology2016

Genome-Wide Profiling of RNA from Dried Blood Spots: Convergence with Bioinformatic Results Derived from Whole Venous Blood and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.

Thomas W McDade, Kharah M Ross, Ruby L Fried, Jesusa M G Arevalo, Jeffrey Ma, Gregory E Miller, Steve W Cole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodemography and social biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptomics and psychotherapy: An integrative review.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Three common assumptions about inflammation, aging, and health that are probably wrong.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Ecoimmunology in the field: Measuring multiple dimensions of immune function with minimally invasive, field-adapted techniques.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas W McDadea Department of Anthropology , Northwestern University , Evanston , Illinois , USA.
Kharah M Rossd Psychology Department , University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Ruby L Frieda Department of Anthropology , Northwestern University , Evanston , Illinois , USA.
Jesusa M G Arevaloe Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology , UCLA School of Medicine , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Jeffrey Maf Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences , Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology , University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles , California , USA.
Gregory E Millerb Cells to Society (C2S): The Center on Social Disparities and Health, Institute for Policy Research , Northwestern University , Evanston , Illinois , USA.
Steve W Colee Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology , UCLA School of Medicine , Los Angeles , California , USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

USC/UCLA Center on Biodemography &Population HealthP30AG017265 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ · 1999 to 2026
$17.9M
Pathways linking social disparities, inflammation, and health across generationsR01HD074765 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MC DADE, THOMAS W · 2013 to 2013
$316k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017265NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide transcriptional profiling has emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing biological mechanisms underlying social gradients in health, but utilization in population-based studies has been hampered by logistical constraints and costs associated with venipuncture blood sampling. Dried blood spots (DBS) provide a minimally invasive, low-cost alternative to venipuncture, and in this article we evaluate how closely the substantive results from DBS transcriptional profiling correspond to those derived from parallel analyses of gold-standard venous blood samples (PAXgene whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMC]). Analyses focused on differences in gene expression between African-Americans and Caucasians in a community sample of 82 healthy adults (age 18-70 years; mean 35). Across 19,679 named gene transcripts, DBS-derived values correlated r = .85 with both PAXgene and PBMC values. Results from bioinformatics analyses of gene expression derived from DBS samples were concordant with PAXgene and PBMC samples in identifying increased Type I interferon signaling and up-regulated activity of monocytes and natural killer (NK) cells in African-Americans compared to Caucasian participants. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of DBS in field-based studies of gene expression and encourage future studies of human transcriptome dynamics in larger, more representative samples than are possible with clinic- or lab-based research designs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBody Mass IndexChicagoComputational BiologyDried Blood Spot TestingFemaleGene ExpressionGenome, HumanHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMaleMiddle AgedPhlebotomyRNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27337553
PMCPMC4972449
OpenAlexW2461654689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.