Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27337030›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2017

Newborn screening for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: evidence summary and advisory committee recommendation.

Alex R Kemper, Jeffrey Brosco, Anne Marie Comeau, Nancy S Green, Scott D Grosse, Elizabeth Jones, Jennifer M Kwon, Wendy K K Lam, Jelili Ojodu, Lisa A Prosser and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Seizures in childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Reporting ABCD1 variants as actionable secondary findings on exome and genome sequencing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Estimation ofGenetics in medicine open · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alex R KemperDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-3997
Jeffrey BroscoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1792-1888
Anne Marie ComeauDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA.
Nancy S GreenDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1078-6855
Elizabeth JonesAssociation of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer M KwonDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Wendy K K LamDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4110-9059
Jelili OjoduAssociation of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Lisa A ProsserChild Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Susan TanksleyTexas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services in February 2016 recommended that X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) be added to the recommended uniform screening panel for state newborn screening programs. This decision was informed by data presented on the accuracy of screening from New York, the only state that currently offers X-ALD newborn screening, and published and unpublished data showing health benefits of earlier treatment (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and adrenal hormone replacement therapy) for the childhood cerebral form of X-ALD. X-ALD newborn screening also identifies individuals with later-onset disease, but poor genotype-phenotype correlation makes predicting health outcomes difficult and might increase the risk of unnecessary treatment. Few data are available regarding the harms of screening and presymptomatic identification. Significant challenges exist for implementing comprehensive X-ALD newborn screening, including incorporation of the test, coordinating follow-up diagnostic and treatment care, and coordination of extended family testing after case identification.Genet Med 19 1, 121-126.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAdrenoleukodystrophyAdvisory CommitteesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily D, Member 1FemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMutationNew YorkPhenotypeUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesABCD1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily D, Member 1

Identifiers

PMID27337030
PMCPMC5182180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.