Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27336693›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Unraveling Kinase Activation Dynamics Using Kinase-Substrate Relationships from Temporal Large-Scale Phosphoproteomics Studies.

Westa Domanova, James Krycer, Rima Chaudhuri, Pengyi Yang, Fatemeh Vafaee, Daniel Fazakerley, Sean Humphrey, David James, Zdenka Kuncic

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phosphoproteomics data-driven signalling network inference: Does it work?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. AKTivation mechanisms.Current opinion in structural biology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Westa DomanovaCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3215-4883
James KrycerCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Rima ChaudhuriCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Pengyi YangNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, United States of America.
Fatemeh VafaeeCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Daniel FazakerleyCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Sean HumphreyDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, 82152, Germany.
David JamesCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Zdenka KuncicCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DENational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to stimuli, biological processes are tightly controlled by dynamic cellular signaling mechanisms. Reversible protein phosphorylation occurs on rapid time-scales (milliseconds to seconds), making it an ideal carrier of these signals. Advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomics have led to the identification of many tens of thousands of phosphorylation sites, yet for the majority of these the kinase is unknown and the underlying network topology of signaling networks therefore remains obscured. Identifying kinase substrate relationships (KSRs) is therefore an important goal in cell signaling research. Existing consensus sequence motif based prediction algorithms do not consider the biological context of KSRs, and are therefore insensitive to many other mechanisms guiding kinase-substrate recognition in cellular contexts. Here, we use temporal information to identify biologically relevant KSRs from Large-scale In Vivo Experiments (KSR-LIVE) in a data-dependent and automated fashion. First, we used available phosphorylation databases to construct a repository of existing experimentally-predicted KSRs. For each kinase in this database, we used time-resolved phosphoproteomics data to examine how its substrates changed in phosphorylation over time. Although substrates for a particular kinase clustered together, they often exhibited a different temporal pattern to the phosphorylation of the kinase. Therefore, although phosphorylation regulates kinase activity, our findings imply that substrate phosphorylation likely serve as a better proxy for kinase activity than kinase phosphorylation. KSR-LIVE can thereby infer which kinases are regulated within a biological context. Moreover, KSR-LIVE can also be used to automatically generate positive training sets for the subsequent prediction of novel KSRs using machine learning approaches. We demonstrate that this approach can distinguish between Akt and Rps6kb1, two kinases that share the same linear consensus motif, and provide evidence suggesting IRS-1 S265 as a novel Akt site. KSR-LIVE is an open-access algorithm that allows users to dissect phosphorylation signaling within a specific biological context, with the potential to be included in the standard analysis workflow for studying temporal high-throughput signal transduction data.

Indexed as

ProteomicsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationProtein KinasesReproducibility of ResultsSubstrate SpecificityWeb BrowserPhosphoproteinsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID27336693
PMCPMC4918924
OpenAlexW2472644780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.