SynthesisPloS one2016
Diagnostic Accuracy of PIK3CA Mutation Detection by Circulating Free DNA in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of HPV Infection Among Chinese Males With HPV-Related Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical virology · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of seven biomarkers for breast cancer: an overview with evidence mapping and indirect comparisons of diagnostic test accuracy.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Accuracy of analysis of cfDNA for detection of single nucleotide variants and copy number variants in breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2019Pooled it
- No significant association between PIK3CA mutation and survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2017Pooled it
- Use of Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) for Measurement of Therapy Predictive Biomarkers in Patients with Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- The diagnostic accuracy ofTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Article
- Peripheral Blood-Based Biopsy for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Early Detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- Towards Circulating-Tumor DNA-Based Precision Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- PIK3CA mutations confer resistance to first-line chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.Cell death & disease · 2018Article
- Progression inference for somatic mutations in cancer.Heliyon · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutation of p110 alpha-catalytic subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PIK3CA) has high predictive and prognostic values for breast cancer. Hence, there has been a marked interest in detecting and monitoring PIK3CA genotype with non-invasive technique, such as circulating free DNA (cfDNA). However, the diagnostic accuracy of PIK3CA genotyping by cfDNA is still a problem of controversy. Here, we conducted the first meta-analysis to evaluate overall diagnostic performance of cfDNA for PIK3CA mutation detection. Literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Seven cohorts from five studies with 247 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for accuracy evaluation. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.86-1.00), respectively; the pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio were 42.8 (95% CI 5.1-356.9) and 0.14 (95% CI 0.02-1.34), respectively; diagnostic odds ratio for evaluating the overall diagnostic performance was 300 (95% CI 8-11867); area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve reached 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analysis with metastatic breast cancer revealed remarkable improvement in diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 0.86-0.91; specificity: 0.98; diagnostic odds ratio: 300-428). This meta-analysis proved that detecting PIK3CA gene mutation by cfDNA has high diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer, especially for metastatic breast cancer. It may serve as a reliable non-invasive assay for detecting and monitoring PIK3CA mutation status in order to deliver personalized and precise treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.