Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27336212›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2016

Cancer risk in first- and second-degree relatives of men with poor semen quality.

Ross E Anderson, Heidi A Hanson, Darshan P Patel, Erica Johnstone, Kenneth I Aston, Douglas T Carrell, William T Lowrance, Ken R Smith, James M Hotaling

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Testicular cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2018
    Review
  19. Limitations and opportunities in male fertility databases.Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ross E AndersonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: r.anderson@hsc.utah.edu.
Heidi A HansonDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Darshan P PatelDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Erica JohnstoneDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Kenneth I AstonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Douglas T CarrellDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
William T LowranceDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ken R SmithDepartment of Family and Consumer Studies and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
James M HotalingDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
University of Utah · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · US

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
The Utah Study of Fertility, Longevity and AgingR01AG022095 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SMITH, KEN R · 2003 to 2015
$9.4M
Utah Building Interdisciplinary Resreach Careers in Women's Health Career Development ProgramK12HD085852 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI VARNER, MICHAEL W. · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022095NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD085852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo further characterize the association of male infertility with health risks by evaluating semen quality and cancer risk in family members.

designRetrospective, cohort study.

settingNot applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 12,889 men undergoing SA and 12,889 fertile control subjects that had first-degree relative (FDR) data (n = 130,689) and 8,032 men with SA and 8,032 fertile control subjects with complete second-degree relative (SDR) data (n = 247,204) were identified through the UPDB. An equal number of fertile population control subjects were matched.

interventionsNone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adult all-site, testicular, thyroid, breast, prostate, melanoma, bladder, ovarian, and kidney cancer diagnoses in FDRs and SDRs. RESULT(S): The FDRs of men with SA had a 52% increased risk of testicular cancer compared with the FDRs of fertile population control subjects. There was no significant difference in testicular cancer risk for the SDRs based on any of the semen parameters. The FDRs and SDRs of azoospermic men had a significantly increased risk of thyroid cancer compared with fertile population control subjects. CONCLUSION(S): These data suggest a link between male infertility and selected cancer risk in relatives. This highlights the possibilities of shared biologic mechanisms between the two diseases, exposure to environmental factors, and an increased level of genetic and/or epigenetic burden in subfertile men and their relatives that may be associated with risk of cancer.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualFertilityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeredityHumansInfertility, MaleMaleNeoplasmsPedigreePhenotypeRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaUtahandrologyEpidemiologyinfertilitysemen analysistesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID27336212
PMCPMC5617641
OpenAlexW2464980470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.