Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27335854›Full record

ArticleISRN parasitology2013

Morphologic and Molecular Characterization of a Demodex (Acari: Demodicidae) Species from White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus).

Michael J Yabsley, Sarah E Clay, Samantha E J Gibbs, Mark W Cunningham, Michaela G Austel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN parasitology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. First Detection of Human- and Dog-AssociatedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparison of Diagnostic Methods and Sampling Sites for the Detection of Demodex musculi.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael J YabsleySoutheastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, Department of Population Health, The University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Wildlife Health Building, Athens, GA 30602, USA; Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Sarah E ClaySoutheastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, Department of Population Health, The University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Wildlife Health Building, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Samantha E J GibbsSoutheastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, Department of Population Health, The University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Wildlife Health Building, Athens, GA 30602, USA; Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S Fish & Wildlife Service, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
Mark W CunninghamFlorida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA.
Michaela G AustelDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, The University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; Massachusetts Veterinary Referral Hospital, Woburn, MA 01801, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demodex mites, although usually nonpathogenic, can cause a wide range of dermatological lesions ranging from mild skin irritation and alopecia to severe furunculosis. Recently, a case of demodicosis from a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) revealed a Demodex species morphologically distinct from Demodex odocoilei. All life cycle stages were considerably larger than D. odocoilei and although similar in size to D. kutzeri and D. acutipes from European cervids, numerous morphometrics distinguished the four species. Adult males and females were 209.1 ± 13.1 and 225.5 ± 13.4 μm in length, respectively. Ova, larva, and nymphs measured 65.1 ± 4.1, 124.9 ± 11.6, and 205.1 ± 19.4 μm in length, respectively. For phylogenetic analyses, a portion of the 18S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced from samples of the WTD Demodex sp., two Demodex samples from domestic dogs, and Demodex ursi from a black bear. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the WTD Demodex was most similar to D. musculi from laboratory mice. A partial sequence from D. ursi was identical to the WTD Demodex sequence; however, these two species can be differentiated morphologically. This paper describes a second Demodex species from white-tailed deer and indicates that 18S rRNA is useful for phylogenetic analysis of most Demodex species, but two morphologically distinct species had identical partial sequences. Additional gene targets should be investigated for phylogenetic and parasite-host association studies.

Identifiers

PMID27335854
PMCPMC4890869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.