ArticleBMJ quality improvement reports2016
A change of culture: reducing blood culture contamination rates in an Emergency Department.
Article in BMJ quality improvement reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician perspectives on blood culture practice and diagnostic stewardship in regional emergency departments.Journal of medical microbiology · 2026Article
- A scoping review of interventions to improve blood culture sampling practices in hospital acute care settings.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Decreasing blood culture contamination rates in a rural emergency department: a quality improvement initiative.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- A Five-Bundle Intervention to Improve Blood Culture Use in a Tertiary Hospital in Romania.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reducing Blood Culture Contamination Rates: Introduction of a Combined Education and Skin Antisepsis Intervention.Access microbiology · 2024Article
- Blood culture contamination in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective three-year study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Septic shock definitions and associated outcomes in blood culture positive critically ill patients.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Clean the skin: Reducing blood culture contamination in the emergency department.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2022Article
- Changes in Use of Blood Cultures in a COVID-19-Dedicated Tertiary Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Identification of the main contributors to blood culture contamination at a tertiary care academic medical center.Infection prevention in practice · 2022Article
- Are current clinical guidelines on the use of Peripheral Intravenous Cannula for blood draws supported by evidence? An organizational case study.Nursing open · 2020Article
- Blood culture contamination in a tertiary care hospital of Saudi Arabia. A one-year study.Saudi medical journal · 2020Article
- Defining System Requirements for Simplified Blood Culture to Enable Widespread Use in Resource-Limited Settings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood cultures are an important investigation to help tailor effective management for patients with severe sepsis. Frequent contaminated samples increase laboratory workload and can delay or cause incorrect changes to patient management. This can prolong patient hospitalisation, increase the risk of harm and increase cost to health boards. Current guidelines advocate a contamination rate of 2-3%. From January 2013 to November 2014 inclusive, the contamination rate was 4.74% in our Emergency Department, responsible for initial management and investigation of over 40 cases of sepsis per month. A Quality Improvement team was created to try to reduce contamination rates to the recommended target. An initial baseline survey of local staff showed good understanding of when to obtain a blood culture but there was variability in the methods and equipment used. A project was then conducted which focused on rationalising and standardising equipment and technique for blood culture sampling along with staff education to support this change. A simple department target of 30 days free from a contaminated blood culture was created which, if achieved, would ensure a contamination rate of less than 3%. This was supported by ongoing surveillance of contamination rates and investigation of contaminated sample cases. We were able to then identify high risk patients and factors which increased the chance of blood culture contamination. This allowed us to formulate solutions to help reduce the risks of contamination. Department achievements and learning points to help prevent further contamination were fed back positively to all staff. This project operated for 12-months and successfully reduced local contamination rates to 2.0%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.