Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27335049›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2016

Tolerability of Crisaborole Ointment for Application on Sensitive Skin Areas: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Lee T Zane, Matilda H Hughes, Sepehr Shakib

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Experimental Drugs with the Potential to Treat Atopic Eczema.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  10. Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibition in Psoriasis.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Crisaborole: A Novel Nonsteroidal Topical Treatment for Atopic Dermatitis.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lee T ZaneAnacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1020 E Meadow Cir, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA. lzane@anacor.com.
Matilda H HughesAnacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1020 E Meadow Cir, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, USA.
Sepehr ShakibDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, The Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis often present in sensitive and thin-skinned areas that are at higher risk for topical treatment-related skin irritation (e.g., burning, stinging).

objectivesOur objective was to address the need for topical treatments that can be safely applied to these areas. We assessed the local tolerability of crisaborole topical ointment when applied to sensitive and thin-skinned areas of healthy volunteers.

methodsIn this phase I, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, single-center study, 32 subjects were randomized 3:1 to twice-daily application of crisaborole topical ointment, 2 %, (n = 24) or vehicle ointment (n = 8) for 21 days to 13 anatomic skin areas, including the face/hairline, genitals, extensor, and intertriginous areas. The primary endpoint was assessment of the frequency and severity of local tolerability symptoms (burning/stinging, erythema, and pruritus) using the Local Tolerability Scale.

resultsOverall, 98.8 % of all tolerability assessments had a grade of 0 (no signs/symptoms of irritation) and 0.1 % had a grade >1 (mild); no differences were observed in the frequency of local tolerability scores between treatment groups. The total frequency of local tolerability assessments graded >0 (none) was lower across all application sites with crisaborole ointment (0.0-2.2 %) than with vehicle ointment (2.4-7.1 %). Local tolerability did not change over time, and was comparable between sensitive and nonsensitive skin areas.

conclusionsCrisaborole ointment application to sensitive skin areas was well tolerated in healthy volunteers, supporting its potential role as a topical treatment alternative for patients with AD or psoriasis.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdolescentAdultBoron CompoundsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDermatologic AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOintmentsSkinYoung AdultBoron CompoundsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocycliccrisaboroleDermatologic AgentsOintments

Identifiers

PMID27335049
PMCPMC5045489
OpenAlexW2465571689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.