ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2016
Effect of manipulating recombination rates on response to selection in livestock breeding programs.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining crossover count and position in two pig lines with different selection histories.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Optimum recombination rates for genetic gains in simulated recurrent selection in empirical maize populations.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Simulating the impact of recombination rate on genomic selection breeding outcomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Mixed Outcomes in Recombination Rates After Domestication: Revisiting Theory and Data.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- The effect of haplotype size on genomic selection accuracy and epistasis: An empirical study in rice.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Exploring Meiotic Recombination and Its Potential Benefits in South African Beef Cattle: A Review.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Independent genetic basis of meiotic crossover positioning and interference in domestic pigs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Potential approaches to create ultimate genotypes in crops and livestock.Nature genetics · 2024Review
- Enhanced recombination empowers the detection and mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Understanding the Genetic Basis of Variation in Meiotic Recombination: Past, Present, and Future.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Review
- Genetic architecture of individual meiotic crossover rate and distribution in Atlantic Salmon.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Exploring impact of recombination landscapes on breeding outcomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Review
- If it ain't broke, don't fix it: evaluating the effect of increased recombination on response to selection for wheat breeding.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Accurate recombination estimation from pooled genotyping and sequencing: a case study on barley.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Recombination rates in pigs differ between breeds, sexes and individuals, and are associated with the RNF212, SYCP2, PRDM7, MEI1 and MSH4 loci.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022Review
- Genetic variation in recombination rate in the pig.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Emerging issues in genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- Effect of Temperature and Maternal Age on Recombination Rate in Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn this work, we performed simulations to explore the potential of manipulating recombination rates to increase response to selection in livestock breeding programs.
methodsWe carried out ten replicates of several scenarios that followed a common overall structure but differed in the average rate of recombination along the genome (expressed as the length of a chromosome in Morgan), the genetic architecture of the trait under selection, and the selection intensity under truncation selection (expressed as the proportion of males selected). Recombination rates were defined by simulating nine different chromosome lengths: 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 Morgan, respectively. One Morgan was considered to be the typical chromosome length for current livestock species. The genetic architecture was defined by the number of quantitative trait variants (QTV) that affected the trait under selection. Either a large (10,000) or a small (1000 or 500) number of QTV was simulated. Finally, the proportions of males selected under truncation selection as sires for the next generation were equal to 1.2, 2.4, 5, or 10 %.
resultsIncreasing recombination rate increased the overall response to selection and decreased the loss of genetic variance. The difference in cumulative response between low and high recombination rates increased over generations. At low recombination rates, cumulative response to selection tended to asymptote sooner and the genetic variance was completely eroded. If the trait under selection was affected by few QTV, differences between low and high recombination rates still existed, but the selection limit was reached at all rates of recombination.
conclusionsHigher recombination rates can enhance the efficiency of breeding programs to turn genetic variation into response to selection. However, to increase response to selection significantly, the recombination rate would need to be increased 10- or 20-fold. The biological feasibility and consequences of such large increases in recombination rates are unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.