Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334959›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Nonlinear computations shaping temporal processing of precortical vision.

Daniel A Butts, Yuwei Cui, Alexander R R Casti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contrast gain control and retinogeniculate communication.The European journal of neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel A ButtsDepartment of Biology and Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; and dab@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0158-5317
Yuwei CuiDepartment of Biology and Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; and.ORCID 0000-0002-0767-7247
Alexander R R CastiDepartment of Mathematics, Gildart-Haase School of Engineering and Computer Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computations performed by the visual pathway are constructed by neural circuits distributed over multiple stages of processing, and thus it is challenging to determine how different stages contribute on the basis of recordings from single areas. In the current article, we address this problem in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), using experiments combined with nonlinear modeling capable of isolating various circuit contributions. We recorded cat LGN neurons presented with temporally modulated spots of various sizes, which drove temporally precise LGN responses. We utilized simultaneously recorded S-potentials, corresponding to the primary retinal ganglion cell (RGC) input to each LGN cell, to distinguish the computations underlying temporal precision in the retina from those in the LGN. Nonlinear models with excitatory and delayed suppressive terms were sufficient to explain temporal precision in the LGN, and we found that models of the S-potentials were nearly identical, although with a lower threshold. To determine whether additional influences shaped the response at the level of the LGN, we extended this model to use the S-potential input in combination with stimulus-driven terms to predict the LGN response. We found that the S-potential input "explained away" the major excitatory and delayed suppressive terms responsible for temporal patterning of LGN spike trains but revealed additional contributions, largely PULL suppression, to the LGN response. Using this novel combination of recordings and modeling, we were thus able to dissect multiple circuit contributions to LGN temporal responses across retina and LGN, and set the foundation for targeted study of each stage.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsCatsGeniculate BodiesMicroelectrodesNeuronsNonlinear DynamicsPhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsTime FactorsVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptioncomputationmodelprecisionretinogeniculatetemporal

Identifiers

PMID27334959
PMCPMC5040380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.