Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334952›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Perception of combined translation and rotation in the horizontal plane in humans.

Benjamin T Crane

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Psychometrics of inertial heading perception.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Impact of Canal-Otolith Integration on Postural Control.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Vestibular System and Self-Motion.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin T CraneDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; and Department of Bioengineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York craneb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8327-1257
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Multi-modal vestibular perceptionR01DC013580 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CRANE, BENJAMIN T · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
Visual and Vestibular Percepts of MotionK23DC011298 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CRANE, BENJAMIN T · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC011298NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thresholds and biases of human motion perception were determined for yaw rotation and sway (left-right) and surge (fore-aft) translation, independently and in combination. Stimuli were 1 Hz sinusoid in acceleration with a peak velocity of 14°/s or cm/s. Test stimuli were adjusted based on prior responses, whereas the distracting stimulus was constant. Seventeen human subjects between the ages of 20 and 83 completed the experiments and were divided into 2 groups: younger and older than 50. Both sway and surge translation thresholds significantly increased when combined with yaw rotation. Rotation thresholds were not significantly increased by the presence of translation. The presence of a yaw distractor significantly biased perception of sway translation, such that during 14°/s leftward rotation, the point of subjective equality (PSE) occurred with sway of 3.2 ± 0.7 (mean ± SE) cm/s to the right. Likewise, during 14°/s rightward motion, the PSE was with sway of 2.9 ± 0.7 cm/s to the left. A sway distractor did not bias rotation perception. When subjects were asked to report the direction of translation while varying the axis of yaw rotation, the PSE at which translation was equally likely to be perceived in either direction was 29 ± 11 cm anterior to the midline. These results demonstrated that rotation biased translation perception, such that it is minimized when rotating about an axis anterior to the head. Since the combination of translation and rotation during ambulation is consistent with an axis anterior to the head, this may reflect a mechanism by which movements outside the pattern that occurs during ambulation are perceived.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionRotationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPsychophysicsYoung Adulthumanmultisensorotolithrotationsemicircular canaltranslationvestibular

Identifiers

PMID27334952
PMCPMC5023413
OpenAlexW2471197294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.