Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334902›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Future directions of operative neuro-oncology.

Robert C Rennert, David R Santiago-Dieppa, Javier Figueroa, Nader Sanai, Bob S Carter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surgical oncology for gliomas: the state of the art.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018
    Review
  4. Neurosurgical management of brain metastases.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert C RennertDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
David R Santiago-DieppaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
Javier FigueroaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
Nader SanaiDivision of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Bob S CarterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA. bobcarter@ucsd.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advancements have drastically improved the safety and surgical precision of operative neuro-oncology. These include techniques for avoiding critical functional structures through pre-operative mapping and trajectory planning, as well the development and refinement of minimally invasive surgical approaches. Innovations in intra-operative tumor mapping, and post-resection tumor ablation have further combined to improve surgical outcomes. This review highlights such advancements and discusses future directions within operative neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

Brain MappingBrain NeoplasmsHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeuronavigationNeurosurgical ProceduresPreoperative CareSurgical OncologyTreatment OutcomeMinimally invasive surgeryNeuro-oncologic surgeryPre-operative mapping

Identifiers

PMID27334902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.