Observational studyNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2016
UK prescribing practices as proxy markers of unmet need in allergic rhinitis: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- EUFOREA meeting on defining disease states in allergic rhinitis: towards a unified language in AR.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Article
- House dust mite sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablet is safe and well-tolerated in Dutch clinical practice.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Article
- Patient uptake and outcomes following pharmacist-initiated referrals to general practitioners for asthma review.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Ectoine in the Treatment of Irritations and Inflammations of the Eye Surface.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- Allergic Rhinitis Therapy Decisions During a Routine Consultation: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2021Article
- The Effectiveness of the Bacteria Derived Extremolyte Ectoine for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- A Targeted Approach to Improve Asthma Control Using Community Pharmacists.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Evaluating the real-life effect of MP-AzeFlu on asthma outcomes in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma in UK primary care.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- Knowledge and Perception of Facial Candling for Allergic Rhinitis among University Staff and Students.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- Real-life treatment of rhinitis in Australia: a historical cohort study of prescription and over-the-counter therapies for patients with and without additional respiratory disease.Pragmatic and observational research · 2018Article
- Article
- An algorithm recommendation for the pharmacological management of allergic rhinitis in the UK: a consensus statement from an expert panel.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2017Review
- Medication-related costs of rhinitis in Australia: a NostraData cross-sectional study of pharmacy purchases.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little data on UK prescribing patterns and treatment effectiveness for allergic rhinitis (AR) are available. We quantified unmet pharmacologic needs in AR by assessing AR treatment effectiveness based on the prescribing behaviour of UK general practitioners (GP) during two consecutive pollen seasons (2009 and 2010). We conducted a retrospective observational study with the data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. We assessed diagnoses and prescription data for patients with a recorded diagnosis of rhinitis who took rhinitis medication during the study period. We assessed the data from 25,069 patients in 2009 and 22,381 patients in 2010. Monotherapy was the initial prescription of the season for 67% of patients with seasonal AR (SAR) and 77% of patients with nonseasonal upper airways disease (NSUAD), for both years. Initial oral antihistamine (OAH) or intranasal corticosteroid (INS) monotherapy proved insufficient for >20% of SAR and >37% of NSUAD patients. Multiple therapy was the initial prescription for 33% of SAR and 23% of NSUAD in both years, rising to 45% and >50% by season end, respectively. For NSUAD, dual-therapy prescriptions doubled and triple-therapy prescriptions almost tripled during both seasons. Many patients revisited their GP regardless of initial prescription. Initial OAH or INS monotherapy provides insufficient symptom control for many AR patients. GPs often prescribe multiple therapies at the start of the season, with co-prescription becoming more common as the season progresses. However, patients prescribed multiple therapies frequently revisit their GP, presumably to adjust treatment. These data suggest the need for more effective AR treatment and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.