Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334883›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Patient and family satisfaction levels in the intensive care unit after elective cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a preoperative patient education intervention.

Veronica Ka Wai Lai, Anna Lee, Patricia Leung, Chun Hung Chiu, Ka Man Ho, Charles David Gomersall, Malcolm John Underwood, Gavin Matthew Joynt

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Humanity-based nursing care in the ICU: a descriptive qualitative study.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veronica Ka Wai LaiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-3593-9141
Anna LeeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-0045
Patricia LeungDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Chun Hung ChiuDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Ka Man HoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Charles David GomersallDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Malcolm John UnderwoodDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Gavin Matthew JoyntDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-3435
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients and their families are understandably anxious about the risk of complications and unfamiliar experiences following cardiac surgery. Providing information about postoperative care in the intensive care unit (ICU) to patients and families may lead to lower anxiety levels, and increased satisfaction with healthcare. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative patient education provided for patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft, with or without valve replacement surgery, will be recruited into a 2-group, parallel, superiority, double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to either preoperative patient education comprising of a video and ICU tour with standard care (intervention) or standard education (control). The primary outcome measures are the satisfaction levels of patients and family members with ICU care and decision-making in the ICU. The secondary outcome measures are patient anxiety and depression levels before and after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (reference number CREC 2015.308). The findings will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Study participants will receive a 1-page plain language summary of results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IOR-15006971.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresElective Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionPreoperative PeriodAnxietyDecision MakingDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFamilyFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalePatient Education as TopicPatients

Identifiers

PMID27334883
PMCPMC4932258
OpenAlexW2467319351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.